After weeks of Christian bashing, I would like to welcome the wonderful religion of Islam to the Religious Freaks family. This story comes to us fresh from Pakistan where an angry mob of Muslims torched several churches and a Roman Catholic compound. Inside the compound the 1500 Muslims burned a priest’s house and a school.
Of course there has to be a logical explanation for this Jihad since Muslims would never act without solid intelligence. Apparently, this entire incident was sparked from a lie made by a Muslim.
Local police and the Christian community agreed on how the violence began: a Christian man had spent several days gambling with Muslim men and had won a small fortune. Embittered, his opponents spread the rumour that he had set fire to the koran mahal, a box for preserving torn pages of the Koran. Soon the alleged deed was broadcast by mullahs from mosques.
Way to go Jihad crazy without actually knowing the truth! One thing that just amazes me is what sets off a Muslim. Can someone please explain this whole desecration of the Koran thing? You don’t see Christians flying off the handle when a Bible is abused. Now I could understand if it were the original Koran, but a cheap reprint, gimme a break. And for this alone, I welcome all my Muslim friends to the Religious Freaks family and look forward to many future articles.
Related posts:
- Thank Allah I’m A Jihad Boy
- Broccoli Is My Personal Jihad
- Muslim Pharmacist Denies Woman ‘Morning After’ Pill
- Muslim Crucifies Christian Slave
- Muslim-Only Bathrooms In La Trobe University


November 14th, 2005 at 8:02 pm
From what little I’ve learned, I don’t see why I wouldn’t accidentaly do it.
I didn’t know that a non-believer touching the Quran or that not “properly” wrapping it was concidered blasphemous.
If I confiscated a personal book that was wrapped (to check for security problems), I would unwrap it. When I was to return it, it would probably still be non-wrapped and I would have touched it.
So I could have set off a world wide Jihad though ignorance.
Scary
November 16th, 2005 at 7:02 am
If someone touches the Quran, and he/she is a non-believer, then how can it be blasphemous? How does Islam exist? The logical conclusion is that to convert a person to Islam, that person would need to read the Quran, but that person is currently a non-believer. Therefore, Islam is either loaded with 1 billion non-believers (at some point) who have blasphemed the work of Allah by touching it, or Allah doesn’t exist and it’s all just hoax.
Obviously, just about every religion is the biggest hoax perpetrated against mankind.
March 13th, 2009 at 4:47 am
list mi source…
develop Lykes strongest fishermen confiscates mesosphere!…
March 28th, 2010 at 4:21 am
He he he …
March 29th, 2010 at 6:57 pm
Well that was a hairbrianed skene.
March 29th, 2010 at 6:59 pm
Pot calling the kettle smack. It sure tells like chat.
March 29th, 2010 at 7:01 pm
Only the strong surv
March 29th, 2010 at 7:18 pm
Doubters’ Prison. Don’t question the concept.
March 29th, 2010 at 8:54 pm
the really robust contraceptive
May 26th, 2010 at 9:58 am
screw you… creep
May 26th, 2010 at 11:09 am
Good points. Have you thought about all the other aspects?
May 26th, 2010 at 6:59 pm
Im so fed up with this things. Why r u do this on us?
July 12th, 2010 at 5:27 am
at the end of civilization that everyone was essentially non-Muslims know that they know will be in hurry by the people of Islam
July 12th, 2010 at 9:59 am
m, that’s the classic carrot and stick approach to selling people on religion: offer life after death or at the end of the world. That’s quite a con game (no one can call you on it once they’re dead) and most other religions try to pull it off too. How do you know that your religion’s carrot is real and the right one, since most of the other religions offer life after death too if you sign up to their particular club.
Proof is what you need to offer, and saying it’s in the koran doesn’t make the grade as proof since the koran has many, many errors, so it’s not a credible document or proof. Plus the other religions have their own books, so why is yours the right one, when it has so much wrong with it?