Ok, History Guy pointed out that the Simpsons version was better so I will present that one as well. This is a longer more in depth look at creationism vs evolution. Flanders goes to a museum and is shocked to see an elaborate display depicting evolution. When he asks the museum where the biblical version is, the resulting display is hilarious. Flanders then goes to to push for creationism in the schools and all hell breaks loose.
Fantastic episode and I hope you all enjoy!
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
Related posts:
“we have yet to observe a single positive mutation” -that point is false. Better catch up with modern biology. Positive mutations are observed pretty much every day in fast breeding species.
See here or just use the google, dummy:
http://www.gate.net/~rwms/EvoMutations.html
[...] fra hva? Usikker på om apene i det hele tatt passer inn, men det må være en dose ape i gryta og. Elsker denne episoden fra Simpsons f [...]
Beth, religious people enjoy using false facts.
Religious people caring about facts? Never! Otherwise most of their religions would be in shambles by now.
Don’t let things like the truth, or facts, keep you guys from learning and bettering yourself s! Continue following the dogma that doesn’t exist or answer. Good luck with that.
We have the evidence for Jesus resurrection. The resurrection of Jesus is based upon 4 facts that are agreed upon by Religious and non-religious historians.
We just can’t produce that evidence. We just say we have it. And hey, no prob that god hasn’t shown his face for a few thou years.
Ya just gotta believe, but ya gotta to be stupid enough. Now put your money in my collection plate y’all.
Evolution is more impossible than the Tooth Fairy, Santa Claus, and the Headless Horseman. See http://www.lifescienceprize.org/ for a list of bluffing evolutionists.
Well, not really. As this National Geographic link demonstrates, the evidence for evolution is overwhelming now. Only stupid people and cowards won’t acknowledge that.
http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0411/feature1/
Good link, Karl #2. I have to add that even if evolution were wrong (all the evidence so far points dramatically well to evolution being exactly what is going on), that would not mean that the crazy Christian creation stories (which have no support in observables) are correct.
“We have the evidence for Jesus resurrection. The resurrection of Jesus is based upon 4 facts that are agreed upon by Religious and non-religious historians.”
7500 years ago, humanity itself began to evolve the ability to digest lactose. That evolution is still ongoing today, and is observed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lactase_persistence#Genetics
Facts are facts, regardless of belief. Evolution is real and demonstrable.
Matt says:
January 24, 2014 at 10:02 pm
“We have the evidence for Jesus resurrection. The resurrection of Jesus is based upon 4 facts that are agreed upon by Religious and non-religious historians.”
BWAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAA
Oh my goodness! Amazing article dude! Thanks, However I
am having difficulties with your RSS. I don’t know why I
am unable to subscribe to it. Is there anyone else having similar RSS issues?
Anybody who knows the answer can you kindly respond?
Thanx!!
Asking questions are really nice thing if you are not understanding something
completely, howevber this article provides nice
understanding even.
lookie here
mgnn.com
“7500 years ago, humanity itself began to evolve the ability to digest lactose. That evolution is still ongoing today, and is observed.”
I may not believe that magic cloud man created people from piles of mud, but substituting the word “evolved” for adapted is just as ridiculous.
Mutations are not proof of evolution either. There has never been a pig with wings, or bird with teeth, or giraffe with tusks, or fish with fingers.
Steveo, just go here. Once you can explain what evolution says, come on back and try a debate.
http://www.nas.edu/evolution/index.html
See also Karl’s link above, and I quote again:
“…As this National Geographic link demonstrates, the evidence for evolution is overwhelming now. Only stupid people and cowards won’t acknowledge that.
http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0411/feature1/
“
And from Sue,
“I have to add that even if evolution were wrong (all the evidence so far points dramatically well to evolution being exactly what is going on), that would not mean that the crazy Christian creation stories (which have no support in observables) are correct.”
More evidence for evolution, a tyrannosaurus rex predecessor intermediary found:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2016/03/160314-tyrannosaur-dinosaurs-evolution-skull-brain-paleontology-science/
And note that the existence of the fossil record completely destroys the Christian creation tales.
Guys, it’s possible to be a Christian and still believe in evolution. It’s possible to know that God exists and yet be in complete understanding and believe in scientific facts.
Just because God created the earth and everything in it does not mean he just snapped his fingers and “poof”
science is his tool, God is the orchestrator. He created modern species (yes, maybe even us humans) through the process of evolution.
No, Justin, it’s not possible if you are being honest. The Christian tales conflict with scientific reality including evolution, throughout the bible creation stories.
Your religion is basically toast. Give it up and get over it, and join the modern world.
Maeve, yes, Christianity demands dishonesty, to believe any of its creation crap.
Here’s even more evidence for evolution and against Christian creationism: a tyrannosaurus rex predecessor intermediary has been found.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2016/03/160314-tyrannosaur-dinosaurs-evolution-skull-brain-paleontology-science/
The existence of the fossil record completely destroys the Christian creation tales.
Good info. Lucky me I ran across your blog by accident (stumbleupon). I’ve saved as a favorite for later!|
You actually make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find this matter to be really something that I think I would never understand. It seems too complex and extremely broad for me. I’m looking forward for your next post, I’ll try to get the hang of it!|
This was in a school? Why are kids microwaving pot noodles in school?