This should come as no surprise to anyone. Cartoons depicting the latest Muslim craze over the Pope’s comments are turning up at a frantic pace. Here is where you will find a permanent home for the cartoons that will grow with time so keep checking :) Here’s a good one to get you started.
Related posts:
- Muslims Ready Holocaust Cartoons
- Jesus Ain’t Never Drove!
- Pope Angers Muslims–Forecast Calls For Riots
- It’s Late And I Can’t Sleep
- Pope Discovers Cure For AIDS!
Okay remind me again: why isn’t STONING violent when the headsman was an available option?
So, supposing my wife cheats on me, she deserves death for that?
or suppose people like me who like trying out everyting had sex before getting married, is a hundred leaches a just thing for that?
for Mohammed’s sake, it’s none of your’s, or the Imam’s or the Shekh’s business what i like to do in my bedroom!
Oh, and again how is god’s view on people who are born gay? God must truely be a bitch if he make people get born gay and then burns them for it…
“He wasn’t violent, he didn’t torture his prisoners.
Please read about him first and know who are you talking about.â€
One prisoner Kinana was tortured. He was the keeper of the treasure in the stronghold Khaibar, which Muhammed had attacked.
Muhammed wanted him to tell where it was hidden, so he ordered the prisoner to be tortured.
They made a bonfire on his chest but he didn’t say a word. Muhammed the merciful finally ordered his head cut off when he was almost dead.
Muhammed took Kinanas wife as a slave. End of history lesson. I’ll give you a new one every time you say your prophet was a nice guy.
بسم الله الرØمن الرØيم
السلام على من اتبع الهدى
اللهم أعز الإسلام والمسلمين
وأذل الشرك والمشركين
وزلزل الأرض من تØت أقدامهم
اللهم لا تبقي منهم اØدا
اللهم دمر أعداء الإسلام
اللهم من أراد المسلمين بسوء Ùرد كيده ÙÙŠ Ù†Øره واجعل تدبيره تدميره
رسالة إلى كل مسلم
عليكم بالدعاء
Ùهو Ø³Ù„Ø§Ø Ø§Ù„Ù…Ø³Ù„Ù… بعد الله سبØانه وتعالى
FucK YoUr MoThEr
Mohamed ThE BEsT
Mohamed ThE BEsT
Mohamed ThE BEsT
Mohamed ThE BEsT
Mohamed ThE BEsT
Mohamed ThE BEsT
Mohamed ThE BEsT
Mohamed ThE BEsT
Mohamed ThE BEsT
Mohamed ThE BEsT
Mohamed ThE BEsT
Mohamed ThE BEsT
Mohamed ThE BEsT
Mohamed ThE BEsT
Mohamed ThE BEsT
Mohamed ThE BEsT
Mohamed ThE BEsT
Mohamed ThE BEsT
Mohamed ThE BEsT
Mohamed ThE BEsT
Mohamed ThE BEsT
Mohamed ThE BEsT
Mohamed ThE BEsT
Mohamed ThE BEsT
Mohamed ThE BEsT
Mohamed ThE BEsT
Mohamed ThE BEsT
Mohamed ThE BEsT
Mohamed ThE BEsT
Mohamed ThE BEsT
Mohamed ThE BEsT
Mohamed ThE BEsT
Mohamed ThE BEsT
Mohamed ThE BEsT
Mohamed ThE BEsT
Mohamed ThE BEsT
Mohamed ThE BEsT
Mohamed ThE BEsT
Mohamed ThE BEsT
Mohamed ThE BEsT
Mohamed ThE BEsT
this site will hacked waaaait
whay you say like that about islam do you want me go around and say somthing NOT GOOOD about katoliks or jesus no ofcors so think before you say sumthing or wallah you well se
uhh, go ahead?
We don’t fly into a homicidal rage when someone makes an observation. Note that i’m not religious at all.
ps. I thought this one was dead and buried….
You just send your jsts kill some thousands people, or may be like Israel killing childern with tanks, you don’t have to committe sucide, you have all the weapons that can extinct people.
@mohamed
just think about the extent of restraint that israel has been practicing. if they were to unleash their full military capability in an offensive fashion things would look quite different. so far, most (not all) military actions taken by israel are really self-defense.
They tried to leash their power against Lebanon, but they couldn’t do any thing.
Weapons doesn’t defeat people’s will, you still don’t get it.
That is quite amusing, I really do find it hilarious.
If Lebanon was the pinnacle of Israels military might then it begs to question how the Palestinians have not won?
@mohamed
this is my understanding of the lebanon situation: since the iraq war intervention conflicts have become somewhat unpopular. a group of terrorists poked israel to get into lebanon so they can benefit from this current attitude in popular media. mind you, that still does not change the fact that israel was defending itself. what they *could* have done is terrifying compared to what they actually did in lebanon. instead they retreated and left a population now even more friendly with the terrorists.
I don’t think Huzb Allah are terrorist, they freed south Lebanon, since the UN couldn’t do it for Lebaneese.
Huzb Allah did stupid stuff, but you don’t hear that they are killing people everday, or it’s their regular activity.
That what the Media and the USA Gov wants you to believe, who ever wants to free his country is a terrorise as long as he against the American policy.
Israel went to war to get the two kiddnaped soldiers, did they get them yet? No, so I think the peaceful talking was better from begining.
Israel killed two young kids last week, did you hear any thing about it? No, was it self defense? No, what would these two kids do for Israel? nothing.
Boris you don’t even read and don’t even know any thing about ME. All you know that the Turk invaded you country 500 years ago, and you still crying about it, and that’s why you hate Muslims.
“Israel killed two young kids last week, did you hear any thing about it? No, was it self defense? No, what would these two kids do for Israel? nothing.”
If i am not greatly mistaken Hizb Allah killed two arabian kids from nazareth as well. Now answer the question for yourself: what would these two kids do for Hizb Allah? nothing.
Was the better way from the begining? perhaps, but then again i guess that is true for the suicide bombers from palestine and kidnappers from hizb allah as well, I don’t see you telling them that.
And please, bloody please tell me how on earth it was hizb allah who got israel out of Lebanon and not the UN. From my understanding of the situation Israel was indeed disappointed that it’s trained army and all didn’t get a perfect score in lebanon, but nowhere do i see them saying they “failed” in lebanon or any indication of it. How many Israelis died during the war? IIRC less than 200, how many Lebanese? over 1000. Yes Sherlock it is obvious that hizb allah was the victor in this.
@mohamed
has it ever occurred to you that i don’t like muslims simply because of the amount of bad things that originate from the muslim community? regardless of whether they are connected to the history of my country or not? not to mention the fact that muslims are on average the most religious of any religious community? i do have a very dawkins-esque view of religion, rightfully so…
So, if a group funded by foreign parties challenges the legal government of a sovereign country using violence and defying U.N. arms embargo instead of political process, they are not terrorists?
They do not seem to fit the bill of a peace activist either.
Huzb Allah got created because UN didn’t do any thing to free south Lebanon, so that’s why Huzb Allah created, the reason that Isreal didn’t respect the international society, so people has to free thier land.
Israel is funded by USA, and Israel breach every international agreement, so Isreal is terrorist based on your analysis.
Every time, there is a movement to free a land against occupier the call them terrorist, if you red history, the Italins called Omar Bin Elmokhtar(Lebya fighter against Italy) a terrorist, and few years ago Antony Quin did a movie about him as a hero.
Hmmm… yeah depends on definition of occupier certainly(for example iraq: was the USA the terrorist or the iraqies who try to get the USA out of Iraq?)
to say it plainly, I cannot comment about the last time israel occupied south iraq, I would need to do my history homework first and after a bunch of c++ homework history just stinks(especially at 2AM)
just a quicky: do you agree with Jagannath? you didn’t seem to be trying to contradict him, and he was quite logical about it.
I didn’ agree with him, he put definition for who should called the terrorist, and if you look at his definition, this definition apply on Israel too.
Israel funded by USA military and financialy( foreign country), and they breach every UN agreement.
Sure, but do Hizb Allah and other fundamental groups count as terrorists too?
@agony
homework sucks. ~15 years of c++ experience. if you need help let me know. sorry to change the topic…
@boris,
Nah, I’m actually the best in my class with C/C++, but still those homeworks ARE annoyingly long, especially if you don’t have the source code for some of the object files(which for some reason segfault) that are barely documented.
One thing I do need help with though is understanding open source projects enough to be able to contribute to them… I’ve tried a couple of times, but never worked for me :-(
Group is hardly a country but what ever rocks your boat. It is quite peculiar to read some of the comments as they tend to go along set tracks and with added spins that are if not boring then all too predictable.
Like this.
“A man (Israel) took (Stole) a glass of water (Land) from the table (Palestinians) and drank it (With USA weaponry).”
But a more defined version of the definition without the mistake of equating a group with a country would be something like this
“Group within a sovereign country, funded by foreign parties challenges the legal government of afore mentioned sovereign country using violence and defying U.N. arms embargo instead of political process, they are not terrorists?”
So, if that is not good enough for you , then define terrorists.
Country is a group, you are contrdicting your self.
What is the sovereign country did when they were occupied, they cried to the UN, and the UN is controled by the US, issuing vito after another for Israel.
As I told Omar Bin Elmokhtar was a terrorist for the Itlian, now he is hero even for the Itlian them self.
I think USA at one point called the red indian terrorist :).
Just one question, based on you definition, do you think Isaral are terrorist, it’s still the same principle, what if Syria supported Lebanon, wouldn’t Syria be a terrorist!!!!!!!!
***If the Pope is so concerned about violence, why hasn’t he spoken up about the Congo, where 4 million have died and it is Christians killing Christians?
Why hasn’t he spoken up about the United States being the number one seller of weapons to Africa, often selling weapons to both sides of a conflict?
Once more, your definition of a terrorist is?
I do not consider Israel a terrorist, I do not consider it humane nor rational either but that goes with all the people killing each other on and over Israel. Rationality has little chance of survival amidst people seeking revenge.
So if one country, Syria supports another, Lebanon, then it is terrorism?
By supporting a group which has no interest in following the political system of a country, then yes, the supporter is aiding terrorists.
I consider Israel terrorist by you criteria, it doesn’t make difference if they are group or country, it’s typical double standered.
So what if Syria or Egypt support Hamas with weapon, they are elected by the Palestanin people, what’s your oponion?
Sorry if I’m trying to understand word terrorist mean, it seems to me it’s stretch word, every one can use it the way he want, so I would like you know your version.
I would like to know your version and I have asked for your definition but you seem intend on turning this into a repeat of the cartoon-thread by not answering questions but that does not surprise me.
but, if one uses country and group interchangeably you claim that every country is a terrorist. No country can be considered non-terrorist as they all have been supporting various groups and other countries.
Hamas is in power and took arms and started to attack the Fatah which was not in power, that sounds quite dictatorial and abuse of power if one thinks it only on political level but on human level that is just murdering those you disagree with you. You disagree with this?
Terrorism : The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons.
Unlawfull : Against civilians or against military without proper and official declaration of war.
Hezbollah : Their goal is to “the eradication of what it viewed as Western colonialism in Lebanon, bringing to justice of those who committed atrocities during the war”
At your service.
I will tell you my version, what happened from Usamma Bin Laden is terrorism, what happen from USA to Iraq is terrorism, and also what happen from Israel to Lebanon is terrorism, what happens everyday in Palestine from Israel everyday is terrorism.
Alcari,
So under your defintion what happens from country to another country without UN approval is not terrorism!!!!!!!!!
At your service.:)
What about the rockets fired at Israel? I ask just for sake of completeness.
Do you think they fired it for nothing, because Israel is an angel doesn’t kill childern by their tanks, and destroy Palestine homes.
These rockets might even hit mountains or areas where nobody lives, but Israel tanks know what they are hitting.
@mohamed
so what if they dont hit anything? what exactly would you have done if you were president of israel? and don’t say youo’d give the land back to the “palestinians” cause that would be a lie. israel defended itself, with a high degree of restraint and civility. could have been MUCH worse. i just hope they finally destroy hamas once and for all…
rstraint and civility, when they hit Birut, that was civility, to your knowledge most of the people in Beirut is christians, and Huzb Allah live in south Lebanon, so why the destroyed Beirut, may be you are smarter than me.
I don’t agree with hitting people with rockets, but look at the state, in 2006 550 palestinan died and most of the civilian and childern, on the other side only 26 Israli died.
What do you expect, Mohamed? Your two peoples are at war with each other.
What you don’t seem to understand because your head is so far up your own ass with hatred of the Jews is that the whole conflict is a political and economic matter, not a religious one.
But you just go ahead with your ignorant religious bigotry. That’s how people rule you and your countrymen… because you’re so stuck focusing on the wrong issues that you will never be able figure out what to do to fix the situation.
You’re just like any other religious guy in the end.
What I mean to say is, you’re the same as the average Israeli Jew. : ignorant of the real motives behind the conflict and full of hate and resentment towards the wrong people.
I didn’t mention any thing about religion, I was talking about mostly politics, and how somebody like you see thing in a different way when it comes to certain religion, you see it’s wrong when Muslims do vilonece, but it’s ok and justified when somebody else commit the violence.
I don’t hate Jews, I just hate what they are doing, and you if you see honest media, you will know what do I mean, when you see a child torn apart, you then will know what I mean, when you a father trying to protect his daughter from a soldiers bullets, and he is no threat and yet they killed the girl, you will know what does it mean, imagine for once and god forbid that to happen to you or anybody else, that this girl is your daughter and they killing her for no reason, then you will know what I mean.
It has nothing to do with religion, I felt bad for the people who was falling for the trade center, and still I don’t like to watch it, and I can’t imagine to be them, I hate the people who done it, and it doesn’t matter even if they are Muslims or not, I just hate war and vilonece, yet I agree to fight for you right.
@mohamed
506 palestinians in 2006… how many of those were killed by other palestinians, and how many by the IDF?
I hate violence too, Mohamed. I’m glad we agree on that part.
by the name of god the most mercifull,
peace on u my brothers and sisters in islam . iam glad that there is a reasonable man ( mohammad )is arguing with u people but my brother mohammad dont bother ur self in arguing with them they will not understand what u and me feel iam a islamic palastenian i live in lebanon and i thank god that iam still living even without my legs . i wanyt to tell u somthing u haters and ignorers what would u feel when u r playing soccer ( me when i was in palestine ) whit ur fellows and then suddenly with out any warnning an f-16 fighter flied over ur head and throw a bomb towards u
and then u wake to found ur self in the hospital with no legs and ur brother is dead and ur other friends too and u r lost with no parents. so what are ur comments on that . i didnt held any weaponry , just a soccer ball which maybe consider by israel as a nuke bomb. so jues why r u doing this to us is it because what hitler did to u , u r now being worser than hitler.
Hello bilal,
My comment? Damn, that sucks (understatement of the year). I’d be pissed-off, even hateful. I would, however, not advocate violence in response. I would work on overcoming my hatred and pursuing non-violent protests.
I’m glad to see that you did not call for a violent reprisal but instead opted for pouring your anger into talking about it. I do think that your anger is a bit misdirected. No one on this blog bombed you, presumably, the Israeli government did. Nor would anyone on this blog wish such injury and death on innocent soccer players.
What happened to you is tragic. Please try not to take it out on people who have nothing to do with the tragedy.
Sidfaiuw,
I just have one question to you, don’t you think that palestanian tried to protest peacefuly, they are trying to work it in UN for 50+ years, what else could they do.
They tried everything you can even imagine, nothing works, even when Israeli leader signed an peace agreement, the Jews killed him and killed the peace agreement with him.
And when palestinians were given the freedom to elect their own government, Hamas’(the party they elected) first thing on the plan was “not to acknowledge the existance of israel.” Cheers, yeah they are trying to work peacefully.
I totally hate what happened to Bilal, but you shouldn’t try and make it look all one sided, Mohammed.
Again, if Israel want to exist, they should take California from USA, and live there peacefuly, and leave the land for their people.
Agony, by the way I don’t acknowledge Israel and I will never acknolede them, Plastenians are not the red indians, they will never go away, the right will go back to them. In every time a country occupide another country, they always label people as terrorist, but in the truth they are not, they are fighting for their freedom.
you might as well acknowledge the sun doesn’t exist. the sooner the palestinians wise up and play nicely with israel, the sooner they will start living like civilized people and not like bums.
LOL.
Sorry Boris I can’t take you seriously sometimes.
you take me seriously? you denied well established scientific and historic FACTS time after time, and shown a generally poor understanding of science. you were the first to defend pedophilia. you invent things that contradict things you said in the past. i really don’t give a damn if you take me seriously or not.
I’m sorry I can’t help it, you make me laugh sometimes.
Hello Mohamed,
I simply do not know. I don’t know much about the early years of occupied Palestine. It’s a topic of interest to me, but as of now, I have no idea how Israel formed. That is why I rarely comment on the topic.
My opinion is coexistence is the only possible outcome of the conflict. Regardless of the immoral actions of either side in the past, some form of coexistence is the only way forward. To deny that Israel does not have a right to exist is useless rhetoric. For better or worse, it does exist and will continue to exist for the foreseeable future. No amount of denial will change that. I think that accepting that fact is crucial to lasting peace.
The question of who’s right it is to exist (Israel or Palestine) is the problem here. Both Israelis and Palestinians now have roots in that place. Both groups have been there long enough to have family ties rooted in the area. To simply deny one group over the other is no longer a viable option. Obviously neither group wants to be outed. Whether there can be peace depends on those who refuse to accept the other (on both sides), and whether they can at least be controlled.