A few days ago, several thousand people attended the funeral of Piergiorgio Welby in a Rome square. Many had gathered not to say goodbye, but to protest the Catholic church’s decision to deny him a religious funeral. But why would the church do such a thing? After all this is Italy.
Welby wasn’t just any Italian. He was a staunch advocate of euthanasia, an idea that doesn’t bode well with the Pope. Even more so, Welby was paralyzed and had asked his doctor to die. His doctor responded by administering a sedative and detaching his respirator.
Pope Benedict had weighed in on the situation and condemned it declaring that life was sacred until it’s "natural sunset." The local parish had granted the religious ceremony, but Rome stepped in and put the kibosh on the matter.
One priest was disgusted by the decision citing that the church is rife with hypocrisy by allowing religious weddings for people less deserving:
We [the Church] have allowed funerals for [former Chilean dictator Augusto] Pinochet, [former Spanish dictator Francisco] Franco and for Mafiosi, but we refuse a funeral for a man just because he asked to die.
I find this an open and shut case. The decision by the Pope is abundantly ignorant and void of intelligence. The Pope claims that all life is sacred until it "natural sunset." What exactly does that mean? Welby was on life support. Isn’t that artificially avoiding the natural sunset? Shouldn’t his decision to go off of life support be praised as he is clearly facing his fate naturally without the aid of technology?
What do you religious folk make of this? When replying, please include your religion because I’d like to see the opinion of all faiths here.
Thanks to Simon for the tip off!
Related posts:
- Marine Corps Declares Kids Find Jesus Boring
- The Pope Has A Little Captain In Him
- Pope Discovers Cure For AIDS!
- Pope Vs Islam Cartoons
- Senate Defeats Gay Marriage Ban, Dead Pope Angry
How is death by lack of respirator any different from being strangled by cancer cells? You know the church is really trying to get back to it’s grassroots in regards to policy. You know, supporting psychopaths who just so happen to be catholic.
For great reference.
http://www.tv.com/penn-and-teller-bullshit!/holier-than-thou/episode/415462/summary.html?tag=ep_list;ep_title;4
Oh well, I’m dying with dignity.
Well, in the Pope’s defense, I think it was Jesus who said, “Quitters never win.”
No I think it was Jesus who said, “Don’t try to be a great man, just be a man.” Wait… no… that was Star Trek… I get the two confused alot.
As for this, if one of my cats is living in constant pain, can’t move and eat, then I would have the Humane Society called in if I didn’t have it put down in a similar manner, sedative that you don’t wake up from. If, however, I’m suffering life in constant pain, can’t move can’t eat, won’t recover, hell in this case can’t breath without a pump into my chest… I’m expected by the church to just tough it out and wait for my ‘natural sunset’? If my options are slow, painful, death or quick, painless, good-night forever shots, dose me up and let me die with some dignity.
Political decision.
I’m all for people having the choice to die on their own terms.
I’m of the opinion that any sane person deserves to have the decision to go painlessly, without fuss, and on their own terms.
I fail to see why others have an issue with this. It doesn’t have anything to do with them. What someone chooses to do with their life is their business, and since euthanasia doesn’t negatively impact on the community (it actually brings positive benefits in terms of health systems) what’s the problem?
Gasmonso brought up a good point. “Natural” and “artificial” life are not clear-cut in today’s world. Medical advances mean that someone who would have be dead at 5 now survive until medicine can’t sustain them any further. Does that therefore make their life “artificial” and therefore fly in the face of God’s wishes? Why does the death of a drug addict, due to the abuse of a natural substance, allow him the choice of a religious funeral, while Mr. Welby is forced to endure and play a waiting game reliant on a machine?
Life is sacred, in whatever sense you wish it to mean. As such, you treat it with respect. A mangled vegetable hooked up to everything medical science can muster… requiring daily bathing, toileting, cleaning and tube feeding whilst draining the economy of funds which could be better used for the living — is that respect for life?
Quite personally, I call it perverted.
Hi guys, news directly from Italy.
The pope should stay at home and pray for him cruelty!
That poor man has been tied to the bed for years, slowly dying…
He just asked to end the treatment he was having against his will (since he was completly sober)…
in many other country there wouldn’t have been such problems, but due to bigotry and the pope (and his “sons”) he lost everything, and the medic that has done that action now under investigation and will be probably banned from the medics registry…
why doesn’t the pope goes to french like the old days?? that would rock!
The majority of people under Vatican influence are overwhelmingly opposed to assisted suicide. Therefore, the decision was made to reflect this.
The pope is a politician in addition to religious leader, a horrible combination. That’s the real issue the way I see it. I cry “foul” on those grounds alone, the assisted suicide issue aside.
I think he would only have a valid point if the guy actually requested some sort of artificial way to die. All they did was REMOVE the artificial life they were providing him.
I think (but am not certain) that the catholics view this as just another form of suicide, and they’ve never been very fond of that. Having nearly lost a brother to suicide, I’m not either. In talking to my brother, who made it a little ways through medical school before his suicidal depression caused him to quit, he told me that the medical community is starting to view suicide as something that happens to people, not something that people choose to do. He and I are inclined to agree, because after a year or so of therapy and medication (which he is off of now), suicide’s the last thing on his mind.
So, I understand the catholics being wary of supporting euthanasia. How do you go about deciding when someone is enough within their right mind to make that kind of decision? If you’re too strict about it, you’ll still have people genuinely suffering who just want to die but can’t, and if you’re too lenient about it, you’ll have people giving up hope too easily and “choosing to die” when what they’re doing should be viewed as committing suicide and should be stopped. Ick. The situation is sticky all the way around.
That said, I’m generally in favor of euthanasia. If it can be determined that a person isn’t just giving up hope too easily, that he really has no hope, and that, barring a miracle, all his future has in store for him is pain and misery, I say let him die peacefully.
For the devoutly religious sufferers, this just means they get to see their God sooner, which would be viewed as a good thing, I would think. Indeed, I’ve heard people in my religious community (protestant, baptist) say that they not only have no fear of death, but that they look forward to it, so they can finally be in heaven with the God they worship. Of course those people aren’t running home to put a bullet in their heads, because there’s “work” that God has for them to do while they’re still alive. But, given that they view their own death to be a good, liberating thing, how could they deny someone else putting action to the same view? My guess is that they think the other person would be giving up to easily, “selfishly” choosing to die rather than stick it out to see what God might have in store for them. I don’t agree with that, but I can see that argument being made.
And then what about people who receive a terrible prognosis and refuse any form of treatment? Surely they’re not denied their religious funeral, are they? Hell, they could even claim the religious high ground, claiming that they’re relying on God to heal them, not the evil human-worshiping doctors and scientists! ;-) I guess that’s not quite the same as actively choosing to get a needle-full of death juice though, is it? Hmph.
D’oh, that long-ass post above is mine. I forgot to log in. Ten thousand apologies.
Is it just me or are people missing the point entirely? The issue isn’t assisted suicide or choosing to die naturally or whatever. The issue is the pope’s political decision to deny funeral rights based on popular views held by his followers.
Yeah, I’m sounding like a broken record now. The pope is a politician, and this shows it.
Anyone remember the music video for Metallica’s One?
Anyway, the church always played politics. And in Italy Bene has a big say on matters. The church is like any other NGO.
If Mr. Welby was a practicing Catholic (and it sounds like maybe he was) then what’s the big deal about the Pope’s decision? It’s not like the Pope gets to deny him a funeral… it just can’t happen in a Catholic church. If you’re an obedient Catholic, don’t complain about the Pope’s actions and decisions. If you think the Pope and his church is hateful, bigoted, greedy, backwards or whatever… then LEAVE the church! Really, I mean, if the Pope had instead made the “correct” decision on this matter then the church would /still/ be hateful, bigoted, greedy, etc…
And yes, of course the role of “Pope” is a political position, just as it has been for the last 10-15 centuries. The head of any large organization is, ultimately, a political position, regardless of whether the person obtains the position through democratic election, selection by the elite/few, or by overt violence. That person, in that role, will have to act in ways that serve to maintain support amongst (at least some) members of that group. The Pope is no different in this respect.
As a person who lost a relative, I can tell you this: I wish she would have been given the ability for a painless death via sedative. Her last moments were on a respirator because her Lupus had her on the ropes, and it wasn’t until her 4th pulmonary arrest that she gave permission to be taken off of the respirator and everything else. She died “naturally” a day later.
If I am to use the trail of logic according to the pope, my godsister commited suicide because she refused help and would be refused a Catholic burial.
Where is the sanity behind that? But I digress.
The big deal is the fact that in Mr. Welby’s eyes, he possibly thought that he was doing what was right and righteous for himself, and also thought god would be okay with it. But, it just went against what his Pope believed was righteous.
Personally, I think the pope needs to calm down and look at humanity through clearer glasses instead of the rose tinged coke bottles he perches on his nose.
in agreement with Arktis, the pope is political, swaying to the tune of public opinion (or what he thinks it is) like John Kerry. Who cares about a catholic funeral, Welby certainly didn’t when he made the decision.
Religion and all it’s ritualistic trappings get in the way of the very personal relationship between an individual and his God.
Being “allowed” to die should not be confused with euthanasia.
My humble opinion folks
Watch subject. Bush is forever saying that democracies do not invade other countries and start wars. Well, he did just that. He invaded Iraq, started a war, and killed people. What do you think? Is killing thousands of innocent civilians okay when you are doing a little government makeover?
Our country is in debt until forever, we don’t have jobs, and we live in fear. We have invaded a country and been responsible for thousands of deaths.
The more people that the government puts in jails, the safer we are told to think we are. The real terrorists are wherever they are, but they aren’t living in a country with bars on the windows. We are.
Everybody should have a choice and as far as I am concerned should not be judged for what they choose to do even if it means euthanasia.
Just because I was brought up a Catholic, dosen’t mean I agree with being told,these are the rules and regulations and you have to stick by them. Does it mean that if you disobey the rules you are thrown out of the club? Whatever decision a person chooses to make should be between him and his maker and nobody else. The church still wants to have power and control over the people and yes, maybe they had to be seen to be saying something!
As a Catholic, albeit somewhat ‘funky’ one, I nonetheless have no problems in accepting practically all of the writer’s arguments —give and take some inocuous pen punches about the Pope being “a hypocrite”, “cruel”, or “old fashioned”— and neither have the top Church authorities, by the way.
I am sure that the issue was discussed by Cardenals who weighed in the hipocrisy, cruelty, and anachronicity of the decision regarding this case, no less than the Pope, and that he himself would agree with many of the adjectives casted upon him and/or the Church. His predecessor John Paul II was the one who asked humankind for forgiveness for the many sins of the Church throughout the centuries.
The Church concerns itself with rules in the longer-possible foreseeable term, as applicable to as many different cultures/places as possible and in as many circumstances. Its refusal to grant the official blessing to the Church burial of this euthanized man is to be seen along these simple straightforward lines: NO OFFICIAL CHURCH BLESSING TO EUTHANASIA NO MATTER WHAT.
In my opinion, the Vatican wanted to keep silent on this pathetic issue but was forced, by the media et al (et al meaning ‘giant pharmacorps’), to speak up.
The Church can give Christian burial to a dictator who killed thousands if he wants a Christian burial and was a Christian during his life, because by giving it the message sent on this complex issue —despite all its ambiguity— is: we are all sinners, we all need redemption, we can get redemption if we try.
The main question opened up is: do we get redemption only if we repent of our sins? Answer is YES, according to Catholic dogma. A follow-up question: does requesting a Christian burial show repentance on the part of a dictator?
Church answer might be: the confesion is a private matter, as a sacrament, and not a public show, nor does it stand for a justification of military and political acts.
The ‘individual’ is weighed in with the ‘communal’ in the other scale, and the decision is made aiming at the closest balance possible, but with the communal prevailing in the Body of Christ, the community of the faithful, represented by the Catholic Church. Or so She says.
I agree with euthanasia but in these terms: give the long-suffering individual all the pain killers necessary to ease or eliminate the pain and, if they weaken the heart and bring about a sooner death, all the better. Help with a respirator for some weeks/months/years, depending on the official medical data on average time-span of recovery of lung function for each case. Then, if nothing else works, administer sedative and disconnect machine.
But I am aware that there will be overnight a thousand-fold unnecesary and hurried disconnections thanks to the “benevolent” and anti-Pope efforts of PharmaCorps dud/ettes, the organ traffic dudes, and the stem cell idem. What would I do if I were the Pope? Probably what he is doing: consulting the issue with others, and not only with Catholics (there are secondary channels, the Cardinals).
Jane Doe, “raped” and sorrily forced to make a “painful but necessary personal decision solely due to the woman”, opened the way for a million abortions a year in the US, even after she admitted the judicial decision was based on a lie because she was never raped, not that it mattered at that point. The grave doubts over the termination of life, gave way to the casual use of abortion as method of birth control, and the renaming of the unborn as fetal “matter”, “matter” as in wort, as if he were a wort.
These issues probably weighed in heavily in the soul of the “evil emperor” Pope Benedict the XVI. As for name-calling, he has probably read all about the evil Borgia Pope, and about evil Nazi-collaborator Pius XII. Alexander the VI is being un-demonized by secular Italian writers. As for Pius 12th, Jewish scholars have recently undertook the undemonization themselves. Benedict has more pressing issues to contemplate than a handful of adjectives which, in these unwitty dully materialistic times could never match the adjectives used in prior centuries by the great and formidable minds that attacked the church.
The Pope has to deal with Evil, and with power and religion mixed together. And he is in the midst of it all.
Maria Eugenia, Alhambra, California
Such a typical example of Christian manipulation. It’s certainly NOT going to be the decision of some over glorified cult what I do with MY life. You Christians can feel free to do what you want so long as it doesn’t interfere with the rest of us.
I must bring the effectiveness to do with to thank you can for any exec knowledge I have got usually experienced going over the sites. We’re waiting for the suitable beginning of all personalized college or university survey too as the full ground moves could not seem to be comprehensive devoid of on their way up to your blog site. Fundamentally have been for any aid in a number of people, We are happy aid as to what I have always found at this point.
Well after reviewing everything that everyone said, and sure his is a very old topic. However You got to remember that religion was made by man, we use religion and IT is mythology and nothing more. Every ones worship towards a god is nothing BUT a repeat of history, it should not be that which decides if an old man is buried or not. It already decides if the same sex is allowed to marry(which considering i’m a guy, i only support the women in that). However, we shouldn’t base all our decisions upon the so called “word of god”. When in fact it was just some liberal 2,000 yrs ago who wrote them same rules that the pope and those “dear” cardinals use. Also i would appreciate, if your going to be a catholic liberalist, please learn to spell your churchs own social class’s. You can say i’m going to hell or i’m evil or whatever. Bottom line i’m making is, i would not deny any old man their burial. UNLESS there isn’t anything to bury and a great example of that is(say they got blown up by a land mine). Plus the fact everyone says the religions are diffrent, ok their is a certain changes in ALL of them, but besides that you twats all worship the same damn god so get over it. Yes i am being frontal on this, you guys in religion place so much faith into it. As well as the thing about we being in debt in America, yes we are. BUT DON’T BLAME BUSH, if you didn’t vote you lost your right to be mad or pissed on this matter. Hopefully shows you in the future to not be mad over something or someone, on which you never even voted upon. Honestly all i see is a bunch of religious liberals argueing over the churchs politics, people the church has barely any worth mentioning anymore. THEY lost their political power, this power they vote upon is nothing but dust. All i see is a subjection of a poor old man, who wished to go to his utopia(ill put it, being not religious) sooner. Now i think thanks to the time and distance of my post, mine is filled with more down to earth answers. BUT there is more, as i am a guy who has much to say on many issues that you’ve brought up witin these few posts. I agree with many of you, suicide is something not to joke about and honestly i see it as a cowards way out. I live with pain daily and not even as MUCH as i KNOW a LOT of people suffer and i don’t try killing myself. The doctors of today with their diagnosis of suicide only shows us that they are trying to turn suicide into a scientific means, when in fact its the emotional and mentality of the person wanting to do suicide. Sometimes it could even be them being bipolar, BUT it doesn’t excuse suicide. What this old man asked for, wasn’t suicide. Rather it was a mercy upon his own being, he was given a painful extension on life that by religious means IS SIN ITSELF. Does it not say somewhere and i remember because i read the bible at a young age, from which is why i turned from any religion. BUT i remember in the bible and i quote myself on this, “God awaits in heaven, for his children to join him one day.” Now with that and us being his children, we would only want to die sooner. Well in the common sense of things, so all i got is one thing to say now. Let this damn old man have his funeral, even if its too late and he is nothing but bone. It is still a sign of shown respect.