<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Attack Of The Christian Vegetables!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://religiousfreaks.com/2007/02/22/attack-of-the-christian-vegetables/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://religiousfreaks.com/2007/02/22/attack-of-the-christian-vegetables/</link>
	<description>Have faith in yourself</description>
	<pubDate>Tue,  7 Oct 2008 02:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://religiousfreaks.com/2007/02/22/attack-of-the-christian-vegetables/#comment-35747</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 15:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://religiousfreaks.com/2007/02/22/attack-of-the-christian-vegetables/#comment-35747</guid>
		<description>If I had to guess the why it would probably get back to the doctrine of predestination.  We believe that God chooses whom he will for his reasons/glory.  We don't believe that being chosen makes us better, just more fortunate.  That also means that no amount of browbeating can turn anyone into a Christian, so while we're still called to evangelize it certainly enables us to focus more on just getting out and helping folks and less on Bible thumping.  

I think when you believe that you became a Christian because you are wiser or more holy than others (as some Evangelicals do) it's easier to turn into a Pharisee/Religious Freak.  I don't believe that I'm in any way less of a sinner than anyone else.  Also in most cases the drinking of alcoholic beverages isn't problematic and that may serve to make us more laid back. ;-)

In my particular case it's lead me to see God as less of some thundering law giver (though he is that) and more of a loving father.  This particular view of God also means that even the hardcore cases like Gas and Michael aren't too far gone, no matter what they might think.  One of our Pastors was a hardcore atheist, raised by a very liberal atheistic family.  He would have fit in nicely here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I had to guess the why it would probably get back to the doctrine of predestination.  We believe that God chooses whom he will for his reasons/glory.  We don&#8217;t believe that being chosen makes us better, just more fortunate.  That also means that no amount of browbeating can turn anyone into a Christian, so while we&#8217;re still called to evangelize it certainly enables us to focus more on just getting out and helping folks and less on Bible thumping.  </p>
<p>I think when you believe that you became a Christian because you are wiser or more holy than others (as some Evangelicals do) it&#8217;s easier to turn into a Pharisee/Religious Freak.  I don&#8217;t believe that I&#8217;m in any way less of a sinner than anyone else.  Also in most cases the drinking of alcoholic beverages isn&#8217;t problematic and that may serve to make us more laid back. ;-)</p>
<p>In my particular case it&#8217;s lead me to see God as less of some thundering law giver (though he is that) and more of a loving father.  This particular view of God also means that even the hardcore cases like Gas and Michael aren&#8217;t too far gone, no matter what they might think.  One of our Pastors was a hardcore atheist, raised by a very liberal atheistic family.  He would have fit in nicely here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sidfaiwu</title>
		<link>http://religiousfreaks.com/2007/02/22/attack-of-the-christian-vegetables/#comment-35285</link>
		<dc:creator>sidfaiwu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 21:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://religiousfreaks.com/2007/02/22/attack-of-the-christian-vegetables/#comment-35285</guid>
		<description>Hey Scott,

Why am I not surprised that your Christianity is related to Presbyterianism?  It seems that Presbyterians are the least likely of all denomination to be freaks.  Based on my admittedly limited anecdotal evidence, Presbyterians are more thoughtful about how they practice their religion.  Do you know why that might be?

Anyway, I'd have to agree, Scott.  Based on your description, you and your wife are providing Christian education, not Christian indoctrination.  I also agree that there is such a thing as 'atheist indoctrination', and I think that it can be no less damaging than religious indoctrination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Scott,</p>
<p>Why am I not surprised that your Christianity is related to Presbyterianism?  It seems that Presbyterians are the least likely of all denomination to be freaks.  Based on my admittedly limited anecdotal evidence, Presbyterians are more thoughtful about how they practice their religion.  Do you know why that might be?</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;d have to agree, Scott.  Based on your description, you and your wife are providing Christian education, not Christian indoctrination.  I also agree that there is such a thing as &#8216;atheist indoctrination&#8217;, and I think that it can be no less damaging than religious indoctrination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://religiousfreaks.com/2007/02/22/attack-of-the-christian-vegetables/#comment-35281</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 20:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://religiousfreaks.com/2007/02/22/attack-of-the-christian-vegetables/#comment-35281</guid>
		<description>Well we're in agreement then.  Because when I talk to my children I tell them what I believe personally and what Christians believe generally.  I've never told my children that "x" is what they must believe or that as a family we believe "y" (not as regards to religion anyway).  I teach them what the Bible says and what I believe that it means when it says it.  My wife and I don't always agree on interpretations of scripture.  Sometime we come to a middle ground.  Sometimes we agree to disagree for a time, always coming back to it later.

I don't really educate them on the world's many differing religions, though when they are older I can certainly talk to them about any number of religions and get them study material.  I also like to think that I am teaching them critical thinking skills.  I don't take everything I read, regardless of the book, at face value and I will expect my children to follow in my footsteps in that regard.

Regarding questioning the "core tenets" of a religion, we're studying the Westminster Confession of Faith in our church.  It's basically a book that boils down Reformed theology (beliefs about Christianity that came out of the Reformation, largely Presbyterian) to it nuts and bolts.  We're very much encouraged to wrestle with it, even disagree with it.  Agreement with it is in no way a requirement to join our church.  

I don't (and won't) punish my children for disagreeing with me when it comes to anything (so long as it stays respectful).  So it sounds like given your definition that I'm not indoctrinating my children, which is certainly how I feel.  I know that there are other religious people that do and I also know that there are atheists that do.  I've known children in atheist families that have become religious and have been punished for it.  Any thougts on that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well we&#8217;re in agreement then.  Because when I talk to my children I tell them what I believe personally and what Christians believe generally.  I&#8217;ve never told my children that &#8220;x&#8221; is what they must believe or that as a family we believe &#8220;y&#8221; (not as regards to religion anyway).  I teach them what the Bible says and what I believe that it means when it says it.  My wife and I don&#8217;t always agree on interpretations of scripture.  Sometime we come to a middle ground.  Sometimes we agree to disagree for a time, always coming back to it later.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t really educate them on the world&#8217;s many differing religions, though when they are older I can certainly talk to them about any number of religions and get them study material.  I also like to think that I am teaching them critical thinking skills.  I don&#8217;t take everything I read, regardless of the book, at face value and I will expect my children to follow in my footsteps in that regard.</p>
<p>Regarding questioning the &#8220;core tenets&#8221; of a religion, we&#8217;re studying the Westminster Confession of Faith in our church.  It&#8217;s basically a book that boils down Reformed theology (beliefs about Christianity that came out of the Reformation, largely Presbyterian) to it nuts and bolts.  We&#8217;re very much encouraged to wrestle with it, even disagree with it.  Agreement with it is in no way a requirement to join our church.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t (and won&#8217;t) punish my children for disagreeing with me when it comes to anything (so long as it stays respectful).  So it sounds like given your definition that I&#8217;m not indoctrinating my children, which is certainly how I feel.  I know that there are other religious people that do and I also know that there are atheists that do.  I&#8217;ve known children in atheist families that have become religious and have been punished for it.  Any thougts on that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gasmonso</title>
		<link>http://religiousfreaks.com/2007/02/22/attack-of-the-christian-vegetables/#comment-35249</link>
		<dc:creator>gasmonso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 16:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://religiousfreaks.com/2007/02/22/attack-of-the-christian-vegetables/#comment-35249</guid>
		<description>As a father of two I can say that sidfaiwu's words of wisdom hold true in our family. The most important thing I teach my kids is to think for themselves.

Oh and I will add this. Just because I am raising my kids as Agnostics initially... I do intend to educate them with respects to religion. If they choose to pursue one, that is their own choice. But I surely won't make it for them. No way.

gasmonso</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a father of two I can say that sidfaiwu&#8217;s words of wisdom hold true in our family. The most important thing I teach my kids is to think for themselves.</p>
<p>Oh and I will add this. Just because I am raising my kids as Agnostics initially&#8230; I do intend to educate them with respects to religion. If they choose to pursue one, that is their own choice. But I surely won&#8217;t make it for them. No way.</p>
<p>gasmonso</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taylor Beckitt</title>
		<link>http://religiousfreaks.com/2007/02/22/attack-of-the-christian-vegetables/#comment-35244</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Beckitt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 16:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://religiousfreaks.com/2007/02/22/attack-of-the-christian-vegetables/#comment-35244</guid>
		<description>Yes, I agree with Sid's definitions.  Being a young atheist in an all-Christian family allows me to see first-hand how indoctrination/education works.  I've heard the phrase "We believe" far, far too many times.  I do not think my family is made of bad people, but perhaps just misguided.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I agree with Sid&#8217;s definitions.  Being a young atheist in an all-Christian family allows me to see first-hand how indoctrination/education works.  I&#8217;ve heard the phrase &#8220;We believe&#8221; far, far too many times.  I do not think my family is made of bad people, but perhaps just misguided.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sidfaiwu</title>
		<link>http://religiousfreaks.com/2007/02/22/attack-of-the-christian-vegetables/#comment-35240</link>
		<dc:creator>sidfaiwu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 15:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://religiousfreaks.com/2007/02/22/attack-of-the-christian-vegetables/#comment-35240</guid>
		<description>Hello Scott,

I cannot answer this question with any real authority since I'm sans kids.  But I do have some thoughts (and a burning urge to share them with anyone I think might want to hear them).  I don't think anyone has the right to dictate how adults choose to raise their children, unless the children's rights are being violated by their guardians.  So, for me, what to call 'indoctrination' vs. 'education' is strictly in the realm of opinion, and everyone has a right to voice their opinions.

Anyway, when/if I have children, I will definitely teach them my non-religious beliefs, which includes my moral beliefs.  As far as religious education goes, I'd like to educate them on all the major world religions, their common truths, and their differing absurdities.  But most importantly, I want to teach them critical thinking.  It really is less important to me that my children learn all of my ideas.  It is much more important that they become capable of &lt;em&gt;generating&lt;/em&gt; their own.  It is this last, crucial element that makes education different from indoctrination.

As I wrote elsewhere recently, the problem I have with religion is that it strongly discourages questioning its core tenants.  Indoctrination occurs when children are told to believe theological or philosophical things over and over again, but not told the reasons for believing them.  And it occurs when children are punished (whether directly or passively) when they question what they are told to believe.

Indoctrination occurs when parents use language such as 'This is what &lt;b&gt;we&lt;/b&gt; believe/', where that 'we' includes the child.  A similar indoctrinating statement would be 'You &lt;b&gt;cannot&lt;/b&gt; behave like that because &lt;b&gt;we&lt;/b&gt; believe..."  True educators would use statements like 'This is what &lt;b&gt;I&lt;/b&gt; believe and here is why... Here is what person/people X believe and here is why...' and 'You &lt;b&gt;should not&lt;/b&gt; behave like that because it will negatively effect these thing.'

In other words, indoctrination dictates what a child believes, education informs that child what people believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Scott,</p>
<p>I cannot answer this question with any real authority since I&#8217;m sans kids.  But I do have some thoughts (and a burning urge to share them with anyone I think might want to hear them).  I don&#8217;t think anyone has the right to dictate how adults choose to raise their children, unless the children&#8217;s rights are being violated by their guardians.  So, for me, what to call &#8216;indoctrination&#8217; vs. &#8216;education&#8217; is strictly in the realm of opinion, and everyone has a right to voice their opinions.</p>
<p>Anyway, when/if I have children, I will definitely teach them my non-religious beliefs, which includes my moral beliefs.  As far as religious education goes, I&#8217;d like to educate them on all the major world religions, their common truths, and their differing absurdities.  But most importantly, I want to teach them critical thinking.  It really is less important to me that my children learn all of my ideas.  It is much more important that they become capable of <em>generating</em> their own.  It is this last, crucial element that makes education different from indoctrination.</p>
<p>As I wrote elsewhere recently, the problem I have with religion is that it strongly discourages questioning its core tenants.  Indoctrination occurs when children are told to believe theological or philosophical things over and over again, but not told the reasons for believing them.  And it occurs when children are punished (whether directly or passively) when they question what they are told to believe.</p>
<p>Indoctrination occurs when parents use language such as &#8216;This is what <b>we</b> believe/&#8217;, where that &#8216;we&#8217; includes the child.  A similar indoctrinating statement would be &#8216;You <b>cannot</b> behave like that because <b>we</b> believe&#8230;&#8221;  True educators would use statements like &#8216;This is what <b>I</b> believe and here is why&#8230; Here is what person/people X believe and here is why&#8230;&#8217; and &#8216;You <b>should not</b> behave like that because it will negatively effect these thing.&#8217;</p>
<p>In other words, indoctrination dictates what a child believes, education informs that child what people believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://religiousfreaks.com/2007/02/22/attack-of-the-christian-vegetables/#comment-35230</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 15:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://religiousfreaks.com/2007/02/22/attack-of-the-christian-vegetables/#comment-35230</guid>
		<description>Oh and btw, this question has always bugged me.  I hear much talk about how bad it is that Christians "indoctrinate" our children and I've a question for the ahtiests (or for that matter the deist).  Do you not teach your children what you believe?  If so then is that not indoctrination?  If not why not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh and btw, this question has always bugged me.  I hear much talk about how bad it is that Christians &#8220;indoctrinate&#8221; our children and I&#8217;ve a question for the ahtiests (or for that matter the deist).  Do you not teach your children what you believe?  If so then is that not indoctrination?  If not why not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://religiousfreaks.com/2007/02/22/attack-of-the-christian-vegetables/#comment-35224</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://religiousfreaks.com/2007/02/22/attack-of-the-christian-vegetables/#comment-35224</guid>
		<description>Deus, there's nothing hidden or secretive about the VT "agenda".  It's message has always been overtly Christian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deus, there&#8217;s nothing hidden or secretive about the VT &#8220;agenda&#8221;.  It&#8217;s message has always been overtly Christian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sidfaiwu</title>
		<link>http://religiousfreaks.com/2007/02/22/attack-of-the-christian-vegetables/#comment-35132</link>
		<dc:creator>sidfaiwu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 00:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://religiousfreaks.com/2007/02/22/attack-of-the-christian-vegetables/#comment-35132</guid>
		<description>You know what's strange.  This cartoon turned my stomach whereas Pulp Fiction didn't.  Maybe I'm just getting old.

Oh, a quick note to all the "But think of the children" adults out there:  Notice what I did when I decided that the cartoon was too violent for me (or my kids, had I any)?  I turned it off and didn't watch any more episodes.  Really, it's that easy!  There's no need for me to go on a public tirade to 'protect our children' from this 'obscene' (cartoon, of all things!) show.  Nope.  I just change the channel and trust other adults to make their own judgments as to the suitability of the show for them and their families.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what&#8217;s strange.  This cartoon turned my stomach whereas Pulp Fiction didn&#8217;t.  Maybe I&#8217;m just getting old.</p>
<p>Oh, a quick note to all the &#8220;But think of the children&#8221; adults out there:  Notice what I did when I decided that the cartoon was too violent for me (or my kids, had I any)?  I turned it off and didn&#8217;t watch any more episodes.  Really, it&#8217;s that easy!  There&#8217;s no need for me to go on a public tirade to &#8216;protect our children&#8217; from this &#8216;obscene&#8217; (cartoon, of all things!) show.  Nope.  I just change the channel and trust other adults to make their own judgments as to the suitability of the show for them and their families.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gasmonso</title>
		<link>http://religiousfreaks.com/2007/02/22/attack-of-the-christian-vegetables/#comment-35122</link>
		<dc:creator>gasmonso</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 00:04:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://religiousfreaks.com/2007/02/22/attack-of-the-christian-vegetables/#comment-35122</guid>
		<description>Come on Sid! It wasn't that violent ;) Ok, so maybe it was more like Pulp Fiction than a cartoon, but kids these days are so desensitized that we need to up the ante ;)

gasmonso</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on Sid! It wasn&#8217;t that violent ;) Ok, so maybe it was more like Pulp Fiction than a cartoon, but kids these days are so desensitized that we need to up the ante ;)</p>
<p>gasmonso</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
