Back in the 1990s many US Christians adopted the phrase “What would Jesus do?” (often abbreviated WWJD) to guide them in their daily lives. Since then the phrase has evolved in many spin-offs like “What would Jesus Drive?” and “Where would Jesus shop?” The list goes on and on.
Recently, legislators in Illinois have been asking the question “What would Jesus smoke?” Now some would argue that Jesus wouldn’t have smoked due to the various health concerns. But if you’re Rev. D. Jay Johnson of the Union Avenue Christian Church, you might disagree. The good Rev believes that Jesus would be smoking a big fat blunt, but there is a little catch. Complete story here.
In order to enjoy one of nature’s finest creations, you have to have a debilitating medical condition such as cancer or multiple sclerosis. Indeed that’s a harsh price to enjoy some bud legally. Proponents of course stand by the use of medical marijuana because it is proven to ease the pain associated with these diseases. But the government and other opponents are not so easily convinced as they feel it’s a step towards legalizing it for general use.
The Rev DJ Johnson and various other clergymen see the issue from a different perspective… one that I happen to agree with. They feel that this is an issue of compassion for the sick. Pastor Robert C. Morwell of United Methodist Church in Quincy summed it up best:
“I think it’s a little silly to say we can prescribe morphine … and other drugs that are more addictive, but not marijuana.”
12 states have already approved medicinal marijuana and it has improved the life of many terminally ill patients with little or no harm to society. The problem is the stigma that marijuana has. Many people, especially politicians and mothers, see marijuana as a gateway drug that causes teens to try other narcotics like meth, cocaine, etc.
But a quick look at some statistics shows that alcohol and tobacco are far more damaging than drug use, yet these substances are perfectly legal and widely available.
I’d like to hear what you all have to think on this matter. Are these clergymen on the right track? Would Jesus condone the use of pot to better the lives of people with debilitating diseases?
Image courtesy of eStoned.com
Related posts:
- Pass The Doobie Jesus
- Pope Discovers Cure For AIDS!
- Jesus Is Back And He’s Puerto Rican
- Next Level Church–Give Us A Shot!
- Jesus Ain’t Never Drove!
April 23rd, 2007 at 11:09 am
There are many religions that advocate the use of (what are, today, controlled substances) in their rituals - some examples are smoking cannibis, eating hash, eating psychoactive mushrooms, or eatingsalvia divinorum in order to go into trances so that they might speak to the gods. Knowing this, and knowing the hallucinogenic properties of these drugs, it becomes easier to understand where religious beliefs come from. But with this in mind, I think jesus would happy toke up.
April 23rd, 2007 at 11:34 am
I doesn’t really matter what Jesus may or may not have wanted. Marijuana should be legalized and so should prostitution.
April 23rd, 2007 at 11:51 am
I agree with Your Father. As I pointed out in a recent rant, the line our society draws between legal and illegal drugs is arbitrary. There is no defensible reason alcohol is legal and marijuana is not.
The distinction between medically acceptable drugs and unacceptable drugs is even more absurd. It’s great to see as least some churches placing the suffering of people above dogmatic condemnation of pot.
April 23rd, 2007 at 12:13 pm
Finally something I can relate to! Having celebrated 4/20 last Friday, I can safely say Jesus would have smoked a triple chambered hookah.
http://picasaweb.google.com/theshaze/The420Festival2007
(If you can find me in the pics, you win an autographed copy of Gasmonso’s new book)
Seriously though, there are a lot of assinine things that are illegal to do to yourself. Drugs and Sex aren’t just fun ways to spend a weekend, they are an INDIVIDUAL RIGHT. But yeah, all those sick people? Us stoners are just using them as scapegoats to push the legalization angle.
(Gas, post my Madalen Laundries/Asylum story! I just found out that the only reason they aren’t still in use today is because of the invention of the Washing Machine. Go Science! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magdalen_Asylum)
April 23rd, 2007 at 12:50 pm
I came here to post what Your Father and Sidfaiwu posted, but those suckers beat me to it. Pot should be just as legal as alcohol. I PERSONALLY find the use of either to be idiotic, but I should ONLY force that belief on others when their use affects me. Like operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of either substance.
I will never understand the reason pot is illegal and alcohol isn’t. It seems so arbitrary. I can understand junk like crack, that stuff is just plain stupid. But, pot? Gimme a huge break.
April 23rd, 2007 at 1:13 pm
We should add to this how useful hemp is overall. It makes for ropes, fabrics, papers, etc. Even our Constitution (for the Americans here) is good old-fashioned hemp! We don’t just smoke for Jesus, we smoke for America!
April 23rd, 2007 at 3:37 pm
I’m glad it’s kinda legal where I live (The Netherlands). Not like I’m a frequent user but the stuff is just pretty harmless.
BTW: Was Jesus a stoner? (yes ;)
http://cannabis.net/articles/jesus-cannabis.html
April 23rd, 2007 at 6:33 pm
Rik, I think you can’t imagine the number of Germans coming over to your beautifully liberal country just for pot. People have actually made songs about this odyssey.
Personally, I don’t use it, but I don’t care if anyone does. People who had too much alcohol are annoying, sometimes even aggressive. People who smoked too much weed simply fall asleep. An incredibly peaceful drug. The infamous Robert Crumb actually encouraged every American to smoke at least two joints a day to help build a better America in one of his comic strips.
Legalising Marihuana would not only create a new tax income for the state, it would also allow the state to oversee the (then legal) business. Quality standards could be defined and regularly checked, as is common with many foods today.
Why not legalise all drugs and compensate the effect by education? If people know what they will face, let them have it. I guess the damage to society would be pretty small and controllable (under state control, as suggested above, with the respective advantages). If I felt like watching flashy green elephants today, I’d simply go to the pharmacy, ask the clerk for the stuff and its side effects and take it. So what?! Let people get used to it, as they are nowadays to alcohol, and they will be able to cope with the harder stuff, too. If I’m the designated driver or if there is an important meeting on the following day, I won’t drink any alcohol. Same goes for LSD/Cocaine/Morphine - if I am used to it and know what it’s like. Hell, if people feel like destroying themselves by means of Meth or Crack, go ahead. We allow people to use physical means of self destruction (cars, boxing, disco, etc.), so why not legalise chemical means as well?
Now, to answer gasmonso’s original question: Not only would Jesus smoke Marihuana - no, he would probably also use LSD if he felt like it some day.
April 24th, 2007 at 2:48 am
You crazy stoners. :)
I wholeheartedly agree that the drug laws in this country (and many others) need a serious makeover. It’s another case of over-prosecution for victim-less crime in our “free” country. I am not a smoker (though I did try it once), but I am a staunch supporter of NORML (National Organization for the Reform of MJ Laws), and celebrated 4/20 with a donation to the cause.
There are a LOT of recreational activities that have been criminalized by the gvmnt because of fear, social taboo and religion, and drug use certainly falls into that category.
April 24th, 2007 at 12:19 pm
atheist, I couldn’t have said it better myself. I so agree.
April 24th, 2007 at 3:01 pm
Being a geek I have adopted the phrase “WWR2D2D?”
April 24th, 2007 at 3:19 pm
I’ve got no problem with people smoking marijauana and agree that it should be every bit as legal as alcohol. Would Jesus have smoked it had it been available? Perhaps. But as far as the legality of it goes that has no bearing.
April 25th, 2007 at 9:24 am
bud is good. that picture is funny. jesus put bud on this earth for us to smoke. ITS NATURAL! so smoke away
April 25th, 2007 at 1:01 pm
@yeti
Shut down all the trash compactors on the detention level?
April 25th, 2007 at 3:06 pm
The only thing that makes me hesitate to say legalize all drugs and let the idiots destroy themselves is the fear that there are a LOT of idiots that are only deterred by the illegality of the harder stuff from chemically blowing their brains out. The problem being, when they get (quickly) to the point were they can’t hold down a job and support themselves and their habit, this increases the odds hugely that they are going to commit crimes to support the habit.
April 25th, 2007 at 4:12 pm
What!?
Michael: “is the fear that there are a LOT of idiots that are only deterred by the illegality of the harder stuff from chemically blowing their brains out.”
That has to be the dumbest thing I have ever heard! Maybe the dealers or the manufacturers are deterred/afraid of the legal issues facing harder drugs. But it sure as fuck isn’t the users; they could care less about getting caught, if only that it might stop them from getting their next fix.
That being said, the ONLY thing that makes ANYTHING dangerous, is making it illegal in the first place. I mean, come on man; look at our friend in eastern europe! Legalization lessons ALL related crime, to the point where it’s publically managable again.
In Vancouver here we have clinic, where the taxpayers have set up shelters to help addicts get their fixes. It’s just a choice man, and no altruistic consequences will stop people from making them.
April 25th, 2007 at 4:56 pm
Jesus gonna smoke a bunch a damn fools. On judgment day, that is, ya bitches!!!
Ha ha. Just kidding. I think God the father does the smoking (smiting, whatever). Jesus just does the judging.
April 25th, 2007 at 8:02 pm
You know, I wanna ask this seriously to anyone still payin attention.
If you beleive that there is only one creator for everything we know, right?
Could you beleive that other species or worlds/universes, maybe have their own creators as well?
Maybe if you understood the Scienctific/Mathematic concept of Dimensions? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dimension
You know best, being one of faith; that there is more to existance, than just what we perceive?
So in this realm, only definable by physics; could there be other “creators”, maybe?
And then start to realize, that you don’t really know; or for that matter, beleive a lot about what Science has taught you. Right?
WELL THEN TRUE BELEIVER: you know people that talk to our Creator? Maybe do a little humblin’ in his name? Well I know ALL THE OTHER Creators’, that control the billions of possible universes you don’t beleive in.
They are pissed! They say if you guys don’t stop worshipping just one of them, they’re gonna pull this universe over, and we’re all gonna have to walk home! You want that? You want us all to walk home?
What they REALLY want, is for us to go back to the old Greek mythology; cause it was at least closer than their being a SINGLE ENTITY that controls everything.
You don’t even know what everything is! You have NO IDEA about the infinitly possible things that are in store for us to learn.
One creator, pfft.
April 25th, 2007 at 10:14 pm
Shaze “That has to be the dumbest thing I have ever heard! Maybe the dealers or the manufacturers are deterred/afraid of the legal issues facing harder drugs. But it sure as fuck isn’t the users; they could care less about getting caught, if only that it might stop them from getting their next fix.”
And that has to be the dumbest thing *I* have ever heard. You HONESTLY and truly don’t believe that many (I would personally say most) people don’t do drugs that would otherwise do so if it were legal because it isn’t? If that is true, then there really isn’t much say. It is just an asinine thing to even think. I actually laughed out loud when I read that response.
April 25th, 2007 at 10:17 pm
Shaze: “That being said, the ONLY thing that makes ANYTHING dangerous, is making it illegal in the first place. I mean, come on man; look at our friend in eastern europe! Legalization lessons ALL related crime, to the point where it’s publically managable again.”
And for another thing, this is about the most shallow thinking point I have seen in a while. Lets make it legal to drink and drive since it being illegal CLEARLY makes it more dangerous. Lets legalize rape since it being illegal makes it more dangerous.
April 25th, 2007 at 11:11 pm
“That being said, the ONLY thing that makes ANYTHING dangerous, is making it illegal in the first place”
I think it depends on the drug. I mean hemp, marijuana is a natural product. It is by far much safer than alchohol for a persons health, even has verified medicinal purposes and yet it’s illegal. So you get a benign drug grown by shady people, who treat it with whatever chemicals they like, some quite toxic, to make it seem better to the user and charge a steep price for what is a natural product.
You can mount a case for it shouldn’t be used whilst driving/operating equipement etc. but that is no different to alchohol. Or that it may bring on psychosis in some small percentage of users. But alchohol is far worse. Making marijuana illegal has got a lot of ordinary people jailed for doing something that hurts no one, smoking it in privacy, and cause a lot of dodgy people to get rich by providing it and has any of the billions spent on the war against drugs made a difference? Nope, unless you count filling jails with potheads a difference……
April 26th, 2007 at 1:14 pm
Let’s check, we need several things.
1 - someplace where marijuana are legal
2 - someone to go there
3 - someone to report the findings.
now let’s do the survey.
*looks out of his window*
Nope, most Dutch people are not smoking marijuana, more then half the youth has tried, but only a small percentage actively use (meaning +2 times per week) only a rare few actaully abuse the stuff (kinda like alcohol, only a few really bad alcoholics)
I don’t really see what’s wrong with the legal system. Just do for it what we did for so much stuff. Legalise, check it, tax it.
April 26th, 2007 at 2:32 pm
http://www.mapinc.org/newscc/v01/n572/a11.html
Now it cures/shrinks tumor’s too. The fact is, the government has been surpressing pot for NO reason for well over 30 years now.
April 26th, 2007 at 2:46 pm
I think part of the problem is you guys think I was talking solely about pot. If you read my responses you would realize I think pot should be legal, as alcohol is. If you realize that then your disagreement with me must be on the harder stuff. You guys think crack should be legal? Heroin? If so do you disbelieve there will be more crack and heroin addicts if they were legalized? If so, I absolutely believe you are wrong. Sure, there are some people that will use regardless of the legality of the act. But, there will also be a large number of people who do not only because it is illegal.
It seems to me that some of you guys think the legality of it is completely immaterial, and I just can not get my mind around that. In fact, I will state that you are wrong. Absolutely. But before someone gets all “anarchist” on me, I disagree with the whole “war on drugs” as it has been executed. I feel the harder substances should be illegal because it WILL have an affect on me, guaranteed. If I could be assured that these morons would only kill themselves with it, I would be all behind legalizing it all. However, I find it absolutely amazing that anyone could believe that the crippling nature of that crap combined with the increased usage that legalizing it would cause would not cause higher crime rates as junkies who can not hold down a job have to get cash to fund their fix somehow.
April 26th, 2007 at 3:08 pm
Hello Michael,
I have some thoughts on this. I don’t think that highly addictive and damaging drugs should not be made legal. I do think, however, that their use should be decriminalized. Users should be forced into treatment, not forced into prison.
One point of disagreement I have with you is your claim that legalization would increase use of these addictive and damaging substances. Who here would use crack if it were legal? Does anyone know someone who refrains from crack only because it’s illegal? I doubt there are many. Of course, some hard numbers would be a lot more convincing.
April 26th, 2007 at 3:09 pm
Opps! a double negative. My second sentence should read “I don’t think that highly addictive and damaging drugs should be made legal”. Sorry
April 26th, 2007 at 6:38 pm
Man! Thanks sid.
That’s all I’ve been trying to say Michael! And I know it’s a difficult concept to get around, if you’ve never done, or known anyone who uses drugs.
But suddendly if Heroin or Crack becomes decriminalized, there is NOT going to be some surge of crime or violence because of it. The reason why a lot of people don’t/won’t do the harder drugs is 3-fold:
1. They are fucking expensive because they kill people, not because they are hard to make. Think about it, if your job is to sell people drugs they are only going to use 5-6 times. You charge an arm and a leg before they die from it, or get admitted into rehab; hard drugs do not make for repeat business.
2. No-one wants serious reprocussions from getting fucked up. Most people want to do it, without worrying about it being the last time they do anything.
3. No one buys from a dealer they don’t trust; unless you’re on vacation, or really really desperate. Usually people get hooked up from friends, or friends of friends that are familiar with, and have done their fair share of the inventory. (I would NEVER recommend bad drugs to people, or dealers I didn’t trust)
These rules are similar to how consumers try new over-the-counter drugs as well. It’s not going to change just because the government changes their position on the legality issue.
April 26th, 2007 at 6:40 pm
And besides, there are a LOT of things out there that are worse than drugs.
Like life.
April 27th, 2007 at 12:50 pm
Medicinal marijuana has been around much longer than Jesus - or even monotheism. It is likely marijuana was a common (and cheap) drug for many minor illnesses by his time. So, maybe if he was never in pain and never suffered from insomnia, Jesus didn’t smoke weed. But if he was even *part* human, there’s a good chance he did.
“As early as 2737 B.C., the mystical emperor Shen Neng of China was prescribing marijuana tea for the treatment of gout, rheumatism, malaria and, oddly enough, poor memory. The drug’s popularity as a medicine spread throughout Asia, the Middle East and down the eastern coast of Africa, and certain Hindu sects in India used marijuana for religious purposes and stress relief. Ancient physicians prescribed marijuana for everything from pain relief to earaches to childbirth.”
For the complete article: http://www.time.com/time/covers/1101021104/history.html
April 30th, 2007 at 12:56 pm
Shaze: My life is just dandy, thanks! :)
However we will just have to disagree on the subject. I find it hard to believe anyone can think that there aren’t a fairly large number of people out there that are deterred from using harder drugs simply because they are illegal. No, I have never done anything other than a little pot as a teenager. I am not that stupid. The average Jerry Springer watching, wrasslin is real! believing American is that stupid. People commit suicide all the time, that is pretty dumb. How many people are in jail for non drug related crimes? Those are pretty stupid. People WILL use the crap if it is legalized, guaranteed. Granted some of those people WILL even if they are illegal, but many of them wont. You have as much chance of convincing me that god exists as you do that point.
Oh and asking in a tongue in cheek fashion in this forum as Sid did does not qualify as a reasonable study! Hah
Do not mistake me thinking the drugs should be illegal for me thinking users should be put in prison. I am 100% against that. I understand that they are laboring under the mistaken conclusion that removing the “demand” will remove the supply. I think the last, what, 30 years, has shown that to be a moronic stance. All it does is cost the taxpayers huge amounts of money for no return at all. I think selling them should be illegal and buyers should be given community service on a misdemeanor charge at most, along with some sort of rehab or something. I am not 100% on that either, frankly I am loathe to see 1 cent of tax payer dollars used to rehab anyone stupid enough to get hooked on crack or heroin, etc, unless it was completely out of their control.
We should NOT support stupidity in this country, it is rampant enough as it is. Look at all the jackasses sending all their money to televangelists or putting in the offering plate at church.
April 30th, 2007 at 4:11 pm
Michael:
You are crazy; I think a good summation of the above arguements is to say hard drugs will never be “Legalized”. However, decriminalizing the USE of hard drugs, and not the production or sale of, seems to make sense.
I think your assumtion of the average American is fairly correct, but I’m pretty sure EVERYONE knows the effects of ALL drugs by now. Comparing drug use to Suicide is silly man, but in my opinion, both should be legal. If you’re sick, dying or old, you deserve to make whatever decisions you want about what’s left of your body.
That being said, if there are (as you put it), a plethora of morons out there waiting for the laws to change so that they can try drugs, then great. Let’s give them all the authority they need to go kill themselves; the world needs less idiots. But I think if we ever got to that point, there would be a lot more educated facts surrounding their use than currently exists.
“We should NOT support stupidity in this country”
Didn’t more than 50% of you vote for Bush? Twice? I dunno man, I find it hard to get my head around your logic. Here in Canada, we already employ a decriminalized approach similar to what you describe. I don’t know anyone that actually respects the laws in either country, regarding drugs, or ANYTHING illegal for that matter. If people wanna do it, they are going to fucking do it, regardless if the laws say no. Drugs are NOT hard to score, even the hard ones; all you have to do is ask.
May 4th, 2007 at 3:48 pm
You know, everything just fell into place. You went about restating many of my arguments after calling me crazy yet you pretty much seemed to agree with me, but you made it sound like I took the opposite stance. Then you made the statement that brought it all home, you said you are Canadian. I really wish you had made that clear at the onset of this, I would not have wasted my time arguing with you.
May 4th, 2007 at 3:50 pm
Damn this non-editing of posts!!
I also meant to make a statement. I find it kind of funny that you are so taken aback by my comparison of hard drug use to suicide. Is it really that outlandish? They very often amount to the same thing only straight up suicide is quicker.
June 25th, 2007 at 1:06 pm
[...] The case was taken all the way to the Supreme Court. And today, in a split decision, the Court ruled that, as a student, Frederick does not have the freedom to express anything that could be construed as an endorsement of drugs. The political left (myself included) is outraged by the further degradation of our personal freedoms guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. In a rare showing of unity, the Religious Right is also upset by the decision because they believe Frederick’s right to promote religion! See gasmonso’s post about Rev. D. Jay Johnson for an example. [...]
December 3rd, 2007 at 9:46 am
okay well i just gotta say is………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….well yeah u smoke weed u gonna have problems knowing what u are doing , its almost being having HDA.. if u dont know what that is your pretty much fuxed for life! peace da fack out im skiping cclass and gonna roll a blunt .
Ezzz Ppl , and i think Jesus would smoke weed cus God did make it after all.=]
December 3rd, 2007 at 10:38 am
Does one have to be high to understand what the hell Pot Head 4 Life wrote?
December 3rd, 2007 at 12:24 pm
“Does one have to be high to understand what the hell Pot Head 4 Life wrote?”
Of course not! Allow me, elite of teh 1337 and master of the mal-grammared, to translate:
Hello! I, being a “Pot Head 4 Life” as my online name suggests, have expertise which I believe will bear on this matter.
You see, someone who is a smoker of marijuana will undoubtedly be hindered in his or her coordinative efficacy in a way tantamount to being affected by HDA. I do dearly hope you understand what it is I’m talking about, for if you don’t when then you’re surely looking forward to a most unfortunate life. Ha Ha!
Well, it’s been capital discoursing with you all, but I feel I must be going. It is my imperative to skip my educational sessions in order to smoke more marijuana, in order that I might increase my experience in the subject.
P.S. I think I can also, before I go, convince you that, in fact, Jesus would be a smoker of marijuana. Allow me, if you will, to put my argument into the form of an Aristotelian syllogistic sequence:
Whatever God makes is good.
God made marijuana.
Therefore, marijuana is good.
Jesus did what was good.
Marijuana is (and was) good.
Therefore, Jesus smoked marijuana.
Thank you and good night!
December 3rd, 2007 at 12:31 pm
Nope, but I’m sure it helps.
“”
I have to say: **long pauze**
If you smoke weed, you will have difficulties understanding your current actions, in a manner similar to having HDA. Should you not happens to know what this is, your lives are forfeit (???)
I wish you all the best with your lives. Meanwhile I will attempt to avoid education while making another cannabis sigarette.
“”
December 3rd, 2007 at 12:47 pm
LOL, those translations were great! Thanks.
December 3rd, 2007 at 2:13 pm
ROFL you people realy look at this stuff ?. it can be a waste of time i guess. or if your realy bored….[me] i get like 80 at school so if u think im a dumbass.. think agin im a realy smart kid that likes to have fun….[i have a life out of school]
Lol i mout ppl if u wanan talk to me hit me up at :Your_Gey 4_life@gmail.com.
Ezzzz ppl
December 3rd, 2007 at 2:31 pm
Hey Pot Head 4 Life, I wasn’t trying to imply that your pot smoking makes you dumb. Heck, a friend of mine got his PhD in Geochemistry from ND while high 80% of the time. I was reflecting on your, um… prose.
I’m not exactly bored, more distraction-deprived.
Enjoy the pot!
December 3rd, 2007 at 3:52 pm
As for me, I am obsessed with articulation (and playing around with it, I’m not just a grammar Nazi). And I used to have fun…before this semester…thank something or other it’s nearly over.
December 4th, 2007 at 9:30 am
no bro its just that i like to smoke pot… nothing big these daysifu knwo whati mean….
ezzzz
December 22nd, 2007 at 11:43 am
Hmmm,
I like to play poker for money, and always welcome a drunk to the table, therefore I am for legal pot smoking as well.
As for the Jesus angle, lets see…..He was the unemployed son of a carpenter, who spent all of his time with his unemployed friends and thought he was Gods gift to the world.
I knew such a son of a carpenter and he DID smoke pot. He also drove a Hot Rod Camaro, smoked Marlboro cigarettes and drank Busch.
June 8th, 2009 at 1:27 pm
[...] What Would Jesus Smoke Religious Freaks Posted by root 11 minutes ago (http://religiousfreaks.com) Why not leave a comment below and continue the conversation the infamous robert crumb actually encouraged every american to smoke at least two joints a religious freaks powered by wordpress elegantblue is a custom theme Discuss | Bury | News | What Would Jesus Smoke Religious Freaks [...]
April 1st, 2010 at 3:48 pm
Hello there, Happy Fool’s Day!
You look terrible. What’s the problem?
Gee, that’s tough!
No wonder you’re depressed.
Happy April Fool’s Day!
April 1st, 2010 at 5:14 pm
Reading the bible, that nasty book, would make anyone depressed, given the sheer evil of the nasty god myth that it describes.
It’s all here http://evilbible.com.
It’s 2010. Fuck your stupid jesus stories.
April 3rd, 2010 at 10:51 pm
I don’t see how people at the current time can contemplate what the words “wicked” “evil” and “nasty” even mean.
They have absorbed so many things pertainingt to those words into their lives that they cannot even tell what is righteous, good, and clean anymore.
It’s 2010 now. The Word of God is needed more than ever.
April 4th, 2010 at 9:24 am
I got buggered by Joseph Ratzinger.
http://evilbible.com.
It’s 2010. Fuck your stupid jesus stories.
August 11th, 2010 at 4:27 pm
I have not had a puff in 10 years. The most horrible thing about kicking the habit may be the 1st couple of weeks. Luckily for me that those effects didn’t last and things improved as time went on on account of the ecig. Please don’t think quitting is impossible. Simply be strong and you may well have great results once and for all.