Muhammed Caricatures
UPDATE Feb 13, 2006: HAMSHAHRI HOLOCAUST CARTOONS HERE
UPDATE Feb 4, 2006: MUSLIM RESPONSE IS HERE
Here is a permanent home for the 12 Muhammed caricatures that were printed in the Danish newspaper Jyllands Posten. If you don’t have a sense of humor then leave. They are just cartoons and nothing more. Comments will be enabled on here so please feel free to leave them. Keep it civil and please don’t storm my website with RPGs and machine guns. Oh, flag burning is unacceptable aswell. But feel free to boycot my site as that is a peaceful means of protest.
UPDATE Feb 13, 2006: HAMSHAHRI HOLOCAUST CARTOONS HERE
3,811 Responses to “Muhammed Caricatures”
Pages: [20] 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 … 1 » Show All
Pages: [20] 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 … 1 » Show All
July 2nd, 2009 at 2:58 pm
There are only two worldwide aknowledged, useful theological and mythological kinds of gods:
1 Greek gods and mythic heroes
2 Northern gods and mythic heroes
Any kind of bullshit that emplies the madeup silly name RELIGION - Chriastian, Muslim, Judaist and whatewer was concieved by sick minds of slaves, prostitutes and homosexuals, and natural born degenrated weird freaks.
They are unable to use logic and tehrefore rationalise anything. WHatwer is written in th ereligous bible, was made up in an evident attempt to sound smart and wise and look like the respected scientists at that time, who were just sane in mind, and not some kind of unbelievable jenouses, as th ereliogus freaks still believe becouse of their idiocy.
Everybody who is a religious follower is not to be considered mentally sane person,not only becosue of ignorance, but becosu ein 21 century even normalkids know the difference between Theology, Mythology and Religion.
Theology and Mythoilogy was invented as intelligent tales explaining in a very intelligent way, about how good people must think and act, in order ot evolute and become perfect, if they are born allready sane in mind and body.
All what religious freaks want in general is hating nomrla people and pretending to be more intelligent than normla people, and if possible to eliminate nomrla ointelligent people from planet earth.
The most funny thing is that reliogus freaks believ that normla people believ atually for real in the Greek and Northern Mythic heroes and Gods.
So when reliogus freaks start verbal fights with normla people, they never think about who is right and who is wrong, they just spend their time in yellimng faster and louder their idotic bullshit. This is becouse reliogus freaks have sick minds and are uncapable to undertsand wrong and right, becosu eof lack of logic and rationality.
July 2nd, 2009 at 8:47 am
Allycrap alert! Ally, enough already of your link spew from amazingfarts.org. That site scores too highly on the Creationist Claptrap Scale to be a valid reference. (Holy Smoke handles your latest link fart nicely.)
And again, you seem mentally incapable of grasping the implications of the characteristics that you claim for your god-myth. Yet again, if your god is omnipotent and omni-benevolent as you claim, your premise of the existence of a “satan” that your god-myth could not annihilate is invalid (and stupid).
As dreadreckoning correctly points out, the requirements on a “god” are strict, and even “one error” in the book that you claim as being the “word of god” invalidates your claims and brings the rotten framework of your idiotic religion crashing down. Now, the errors, self-contradictions and complete absurdities in your book of horrors bible are legion. As usual, Skeptics does a fine compilation of some of the absurdities and contradictions in your book of evil. To cite just a few,
# God spends one-sixth of his entire creative effort (the second day) working on a solid firmament. This strange structure, which God calls heaven, is intended to separate the higher waters from the lower waters. 1:6-8
# Plants are made on the third day before there was a sun to drive their photosynthetic processes (1:14-19). 1:11
# In an apparent endorsement of astrology, God places the sun, moon, and stars in the firmament so that they can be used “for signs”. This, of course, is exactly what astrologers do: read “the signs” in the Zodiac in an effort to predict what will happen on Earth. 1:14
# “He made the stars also.” God spends a day making light (before making the stars) and separating light from darkness; then, at the end of a hard day’s work, and almost as an afterthought, he makes the trillions of stars. 1:16
# “And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth.” 1:17
# God commands us to “be fruitful and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it: and have dominion over … every living thing that moveth upon the earth.” 1:28
# “I have given you every herb … and every tree … for meat.” 1:29
# “He rested.”
Even God gets tired sometimes. 2:2
# “The tree of life … and the tree of knowledge of good and evil.”
God created two magic trees: the tree of life and the tree of knowledge. Eat from the the first, and you live forever (3:22); eat from the second and you’ll die the same day (2:17). (Or that’s what God said, anyway. Adam ate from the tree of knowledge and lived for another 930 years or so (5:5). But he never got a change to eat from the tree of life. God prevented him from eating from the tree of life before Adam could eat from the tree, become a god, and live forever.) 2:9
# God makes the animals and parades them before Adam to see if any would strike his fancy. But none seem to have what it takes to please him. (Although he was tempted to go for the sheep.) After making the animals, God has Adam name them all. The naming of several million species must have kept Adam busy for a while. 2:18-20
# God’s clever, talking serpent. 3:1
# God walks and talks (to himself?) in the garden, and plays a little hide and seek with Adam and Eve. 3:8-11
# God curses the serpent. From now on the serpent will crawl on his belly and eat dust. One wonders how he got around before — by hopping on his tail, perhaps? But snakes don’t eat dust, do they? 3:14
# God curses the ground and causes thorns and thistles to grow. 3:17-18
# God kills some animals and makes some skin coats for Adam and Eve. 3:21
# God expels Adam and Eve from the garden before they get a chance to eat from that other tree — the tree of life. God knows that if they do that, they well become “like one of us” and live forever. 3:22-24
# Cain is worried after killing Abel and says, “Every one who finds me shall slay me.” This is a strange concern since there were only two other humans alive at the time — his parents! 4:14
# “And Cain went out from the presence of the LORD.” 4:16
# “And Cain knew his wife.” That’s nice, but where the hell did she come from? 4:17
# Lamech kills a man and claims that since Cain’s murderer would be punished sevenfold, whoever murders him will be punished seventy-seven fold. That sounds fair. 4:23-24
# “And to Seth … was born a son.” Where’d he find his wife? 4:26
# God created a man and a woman, and he “called their name Adam.” So the woman’s name was Adam, too! 5:2
# The first men had incredibly long life spans. 5:5, 5:8, 5:11, 5:14, 5:17, 5:20, 5:23, 5:27, 5:31, 9:29
# Enoch doesn’t die he just ascends into heaven. 5:21-24
# When Lamech was born, nine generations were alive at once. Adam, Seth, Enos, Cainan, Mahalaleel, Jared, Enoch, Methuselah, and Lamech were all alive at the time of Lamech’s birth. Adam lived to see his great-great-great-great-great-great-grandson. 5:25
# When Noah was 500 years old, he had three sons.
[Three sons in one year? Was that with one (nameless) wife or several?] 5:32
# The “sons of God” copulated with the “daughters of men,” and had sons who became “the mighty men of old, men of renown.” 6:2-4
# “The LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh.”
God shortened the human lifespan to 120 years because humans are “flesh” and he was tired of fighting with them. 6:3
# “There were giants in the earth in those days.” 6:4
# God decides to kill all living things because the human imagination is evil. Later (8:21), after he kills everything, he promises never to do it again because the human imagination is evil. Go figure. 6:5
# God repents. 6:6-7
# Noah is called a “just man and perfect,” but he didn’t seem so perfect when he was drunk and naked in front of his sons (9:20-21). 6:9, 7:1
# God was angry because “the earth was filled with violence.” So he killed every living thing to make the world less violent. 6:11-13
# Noah is told to make an ark that is 450 feet long. 6:14-15
# God tells Noah to make one small window (18 inches square) in the 450 foot ark for ventilation. 6:16
# “And take thou unto thee of all food that is eaten … for thee, and for them.” 6:21
# Whether by twos or by sevens, Noah takes male and female representatives from each species of “every thing that creepeth upon the earth.” 7:8
# God opens the “windows of heaven.” He does this every time it rains. 7:11
# All of the animals boarded the ark “in the selfsame day.” 7:13-14
# “And God remembered Noah.”
Yeah. He probably said something like, “Isn’t Noah the guy who built the ark?” 8:1
# “The windows of heaven were stopped, and the rain from heaven was restrained.” This happens whenever it stops raining. 8:2
# Noah sends a dove out to see if there was any dry land. But the dove returns without finding any. Then, just seven days later, the dove goes out again and returns with an olive leaf. But how could an olive tree survive the flood? And if any seeds happened to survive, they certainly wouldn’t germinate and grow leaves within a seven day period. 8:8-11
# Noah kills the “clean beasts” and burns their dead bodies for God. According to 7:8 this would have caused the extinction of all “clean” animals since only two of each were taken onto the ark. “And the Lord smelled a sweet savor.” After this God “said in his heart” that he’d never do it again because “man’s heart is evil from his youth.” So God killed all living things (6:5) because humans are evil, and then promises not to do it again (8:21) because humans are evil. The mind of God is a frightening thing. 8:20-21
# According to this verse, all animals fear humans. Although it is true that many do, it is also true that some do not. Sharks and grizzly bears, for example, are generally much less afraid of us than we are of them. 9:2
# “Into your hand are they (the animals) delivered.” God gave the animals to humans, and they can do whatever they please with them. This verse has been used by bible believers to justify all kinds of cruelty to animals and environmental destruction. 9:2
# God is rightly filled with remorse for having killed his creatures. He makes a deal with the animals, promising never to drown them all again. He even puts the rainbow in the sky so that whenever he sees it, it will remind him of his promise so that he won’t be tempted to do it again. (Every time God sees the rainbow he says to himself: “Oh, yeah…. That’s right. I promised not to drown the animals again. I guess I’ll have to find something else to do.”). 9:9-13
# Noah, the drunk and naked. 9:20-21
# The entire tenth chapter is the first of many boring genealogies (see 1 Chr.1-9, Mt.1:1-17, Lk.3:23-28 for other examples) that we are told to avoid in 1 Tim.1:4 and Tit.3:9 (”Avoid foolish questions and genealogies.”) 10:1-32
# God worries that the people will succeed in building a tower high enough to reach him (them?) in heaven, and that by so doing they will become omnipotent. 11:4-6
# God says, “Let us go down …” Maybe he hasn’t been talking to himself; maybe there is more than one of them up there. Well, however many there may be, they all decide to come down to confuse the builders by confounding human language and scattering them [humans] abroad. 11:7
# Another boring genealogy that we are told to avoid in 1 Tim.1:4 and Tit.3:9. (”Avoid foolish questions and genealogies.”) Also note the ridiculously long lives of the patriarchs. 11:10-32
# The Amalekites were smitten before Amalek (from whom they descended) was born. Amalek was the grandson of Esau (Gen.36:12). 14:7
# Abraham laughs at God for telling him that he and Sarah will have a child, when they are 100 and 90 years old, respectively. 17:17
# Abraham circumcises himself and all of the males in his household. Since he supposedly had 318 slaves back in 14:14, poor old Abe must have been pretty busy with his knife. But it was worth it. Penises are supremely important to God. And he can’t stand foreskins. 17:23-24
# Abraham feeds God and three angels. 18:1-4
# “He took butter, and milk, and the calf … and they did eat.”
Not a very kosher meal for God and Abraham to eat! (See Exodus 23:19) 18:8
# Sarah, who is about 90 years old and has gone through menopause, laughs at God when he tells her that she will have a son. She asks God if she will “have pleasure” with her “Lord” [Abraham], when both are so very old. God assures her that he will return and impregnate her at the appointed time. 18:11-14
# God, who is planning another mass murder, is worried that Abraham might try to stop him. so he asks himself if he should hide his intentions from Abraham. 18:17
# “I will not destroy it for ten’s sake.”
I guess God couldn’t find even ten good Sodomites because he decides to kill them all in Genesis 19. Too bad Abraham didn’t ask God about the children. Why not save them? If Abraham could find 10 good children, toddlers, infants, or babies, would God spare the city? Apparently not. God doesn’t give a damn about children. 18:32
# “And the Lord went his way.” Now where might that be? 18:33
# The two angels that visit Lot wash their feet, eat, and are sexually irresistible to Sodomites. 19:1-5
# Lot [the just and righteous (2 Pet.2:7-8)] offers his daughters to a crowd of angel rapers. 19:8
# Lot lied about his daughters being “virgins” in 19:8. But it was a “just and righteous” lie, intended to make them more attractive to the sex-crazed mob. 19:14
# Lot’s nameless wife looks back, and God turns her into a pillar of salt. 19:26
# Lot and his daughters camp out in a cave for a while. The daughters get their “just and righteous” father drunk, and have sexual intercourse with him, and each conceives and bears a son (wouldn’t you know it!). Just another wholesome family values Bible story. 19:30-38
# Honest Abe does the same “she’s my sister” routine again, for the same cowardly reason. And once again, the king just couldn’t resist Sarah — even though by now she is over 90 years old. (See Gen.12:13-20 for the first, nearly identical, episode.) 20:2
# “The Lord visited Sarah” and he “did unto Sarah as he had spoken.” And “Sarah conceived and bare Abraham a son.” (God-assisted conceptions never result in daughters.) 21:1-2
# These verses suggest that Ishmael was an infant when his father abandoned him, yet according to Gen.17:25 and Gen.21:5-8 he must have been about 16 years old. It must have been tough for poor Hagar to carry Ishmael on her shoulder and to then “cast him under one of the shrubs.” 21:14-18
# Abraham names the place where he nearly kills Isaac after Jehovah. But according to Exodus 6:3, Abraham couldn’t have known that God’s name was Jehovah. 22:14
# God swears to himself. 22:16
# Abraham needed God’s help to father Isaac when he was 100 years old (Gen.21:1-2, Rom.4:19, Heb.11:12). But here, when he is even older, he manages to have six more children without any help from God. 25:2
# Abraham lived to be 175 years old. 25:7
# Ishmael lived 137 years. 25:17
# “She was barren.”
In the Bible it’s always the woman that are “barren”, never the men. And when God “opens their womb,” the resulting babies are always little boys. 25:21-26
# Esau and Jacob were already fighting each other in the womb. 25:22
# Esau sold his birthright to Jacob for a bit of bread and a bowl of lentil soup. 25:33-34
# Isaac uses the same “she’s my sister” lie that his father used so effectively on the same king Abimelech. (see Gen.12:13, 20:2). 26:7
# Jacob names Bethel for the first time, before meeting Rachel. Later in 35:15, just before Rachel dies, he names Bethel again. (And it was called Bethel long before it was named Bethel in 12:8 and 13:3.) 28:19
# Jacob is tricked by Laban, the father of Rachel and Leah. Jacob asks for Rachel so that he can “go in unto her.” But Laban gives him Leah instead, and Jacob “went in unto her [Leah]” by mistake. Jacob was fooled until morning — apparently he didn’t know who he was going in unto. Finally they worked things out and Jacob got to “go in unto” Rachel, too. 29:21-30
# Jacob goes in unto Leah by mistake. 29:23, 25
# “And Jacob went in unto her. And Bilhah conceived, and bare Jacob a son.” (These arrangements never seem to produce daughters.) 30:4
# Leah, not to be outdone, gives Jacob her maid (Zilpah) “to wife.” And Zilpah “bare Jacob a son.” 30:9
# Rachel trades her husband’s favors for some mandrakes. And so, when Jacob cam home, Leah said: “Thou must come in unto me, for surely I have hired thee with my son’s mandrakes. And he lay with her that night.” Presumably God, by telling us this edifying story, is teaching us something about sexual ethics. 30:15-16
# And finally, “God remembered Rachel … and opened her womb. And she conceived and bare a son [surprise, surprise].” 30:22
# Laban learns “by experience” that God has blessed him for Jacob’s sake. “By experience” means “by divination”, at least that is how most other versions translate this verse. 30:27
# Jacob displays his (and God’s) knowledge of biology by having goats copulate while looking at streaked rods. The result is streaked baby goats. 30:37-39
# God (or an angel) praises Jacob for his fancy genetic work in Gen.30:37-39. 31:11-12
# Jacob wrestles with god and wins. God changes Jacob’s name to Israel to signify that he wrestled with God and “prevailed.” 32:24-30
# Unable to beat Jacob in a fair fight, God dislocates Jacob’s leg. 32:25
# God begs Jacobs to let him go, but Jacob says, “Not unless you bless me.” So God blessed Jacob and Jacob let God go. 32:26-29
# “What is thy name?” (God didn’t know Jacob’s name.) 32:27
# God renames Jacob for the first time. God says that Jacob will henceforth be called Israel, but the Bible continues to call him Jacob anyway. And even God himself calls him Jacob in 46:2. 32:28
# “Tell me, I pray thee, thy name.”
God refuses to tell Jacob his name. (It’s a secret.) 32:29
# “Therefore the children of Israel eat not of the sinew ….”
Jews don’t eat the sinew of something or other because God messed with Jacob’s leg while wrestling with him. (Now that’s a good reason!) 32:32
# “I have seen thy face, as though I had seen the face of God.”
Since Jacob just saw the face of God a few verses ago (Genesis 32:30), he ought to know what God looks like. So now we do too. God looks just like Esau! Which is kind of strange, since God hates Esau.
So all those pictures of God that you’ve seen? They had it all wrong. God is a redhead, just like Esau was. In fact, God is covered with red hair all over his body. 33:10
# God renames Jacob a second time. 35:10
# Jacob names Bethel again. The first time 28:19 the name didn’t stick. 35:15
# Isaac lives to be 180. 35:28
# Chapter 36 presents another boring genealogy that we are told to avoid in 1 Tim.1:4 and Tit.3:9 (”Avoid foolish questions and genealogies.”) 36:1-43
# Amalek was born many years after his descendants were “smitten.” (Gen.14:7) 36:12
# Tamar (the widow of Er and Onan, who were killed by God) dresses up as a prostitute and Judah (her father-in-law) propositions her, saying: “Let me come in unto thee …. And he … came in unto her, and she conceived by him.” From this incestuous union, twins (38:27-28) were born (both were boys of course). One of these was Pharez — an ancestor of Jesus (Lk.3:33). 38:13-18
# There was a seven year, God-created famine over the entire earth. 41:56
# The Aztecs, the Chinese, and the Indigenous Australians all came to Joseph to buy grain. 41:57
# “And Joseph knew his brethren, but they knew not him.”
Stupid stories like this can only be found in the Bible (and the Quran). 42:8
# Joseph and his magic divining cup. 44:5, 15
# Jacob lives to be 147. 47:28
# “He washed his garments in wine … His eyes shall be red with wine.”
Did Judah really wash his clothes in wine? Were his eyes bloodshot from drinking too much? Or is this a prophecy of Jesus? (I didn’t know Jesus had a drinking problem.) 49:11-12
Exodus
# The Israelite population went from 70 (or 75) to several million in a few hundred years. 1:5,7, 12:37, 38:26
# The birth story of Moses is suspiciously similar to that of the birth of Sargon, an Akkadian monarch from the 3rd millennium BCE. (BBC: The tale of the basket) 2:3
# God, disguised as a burning bush, has a long heart-to-heart talk with Moses. 3:4 - 4:17
# God shows Moses some tricks that he says are sure to impress. First, throw your rod on the ground; it will become a snake. Then grab the snake by the tail and it will become a rod again. Next, make your hand appear leprous, and then cure it. And finally, pour water on the ground and it will turn into blood. (That ought to do it!) 4:2-9
# God decides to kill Moses because his son had not yet been circumcised. Luckily for Moses, his Egyptian wife Zipporah “took a sharp stone, and cut off the foreskin of her son, and cast it at his feet, and said, Surely a bloody husband art thou to me. So he [God] let him go.” This story shows the importance of penises to God, and his hatred of foreskins, which again would be hatred and acknowledgement of error in what it purportedly created. 4:24-26
Again, even one of these errors is sufficient to prove your words false. Your religion is absurd, and its premises are invalid.
Religion is ridiculous.
July 2nd, 2009 at 6:15 am
POA - I didn’t say I don’t practice the 5 pillars of islam. I said “there’s a great toleration here about not doing these”. Besides I do or not, this is something between myself and God. It’s not your business.
And it’s not your problem to decide if I’m a real muslim or a hypocrite. You’ve gone too far this time by using this vicious remark. I respect your atheism as long as you respect my belief. When I told you the conditions here sincerely, I didn’t know you would use these against me one day.
July 1st, 2009 at 1:56 pm
“dreadreckoning ” ? Where d’you get that name? From some cartoon or do you “reckon” that some type of event that everyone is dreading is soon to come?! :D
Ah, you seem like a polite sorta person; not like some of the “HUBRIS ” that’s rampant amongst SOME of these atheists. Soooooo, what’s your story? :) You an atheist or what? I hope you’re not, cuz the bible says atheists are F-o-o-l-s.
————————–
I posted this already but i don’t think it showed up. I’m posting it again with some modifications :)
Re: Post 3790
“The overwhelming majority of so-called errors in the Bible have been demonstrated to be simply errors of judgment or lack of understanding on the part of those who make the complaint. They are not errors at all, but simply truth misunderstood.”
The above statement still stands!
Look, that bible is phenomenal! and yes I think the KJV should be one’s main bible :) but one could also use a few of the other versions if one is careful and one should revert to the KJV, or in some instances, look at the original meaning for certain words. Some of the things in the KJV have even the theologians stumped :D God allowed it to be written and translated that way to keep people interested and busy and most importantly for them to depend on Him for the answers. Alas, most folk leave it up to preachers, pastors, priests, prophets etc. to tell them what the bible says and they don’t check to see if what they are being taught is true or not.
Look man, I’m NOT a theologian but I do believe in God and the bible and this is what I came up with thus far, with regards to the “errors” you cited.
Matt 1:16 & Luke 3:23 ————-> “Several views, all possible, have been presented, but the most probable explanation is that Matthew gives the line of Joseph, the legal line, and that Luke gives the line of Mary, the mother of our Lord. As the Jews regarded only male descent, unless Joseph, the supposed father, was a descendant of David they would not have recognized the genealogy as a fulfillment of the prophecies that Christ should be the Son of David; while Luke, himself a Gentile and writing for Gentiles, was more particular to give the line that shows that Jesus is really the Son of David. If Mary was the daughter of Heli, especially if an heiress, Joseph, by marriage, would become the son of Heli. That there is no contradiction between the two tables is shown by the fact that the Jews who best understood their genealogies never charged it.” —–> I tried putting this ws but i am not allowed —-bible.cc/matthew/1-16.htm
This site seems to have some interesting stuff on genealogies ——–> .marshallgenealogy.org/bible/matthew-luke.htm
————————————————
Regarding Job 26:7 and 1 Samuel 2:8, you think these are contradictory? Don’t forget, the bible is written for the educated as well as for the simple. God inspired the biblical writer to write 1 Samuel 2:8 like that so that regular folk could “picture” what God means. To me, that verse is clearly an analogy so that people could understand that God is the CREATOR or DESIGNER of the earth :) Check out the definitions for pillar and you’ll see why the biblical writer chose to describe it like that and check out how the word “pillar” is used over and over again in the bible to describe different things but also,in order for people to understand or imagine, what is being conveyed —> thesaurus.reference.com/browse/pillar
p://bibletab.com/p/pillars.htm
———————————————————
Genesis 8:4 “And the ark rested in the seventh month, on the seventeenth day of the month, upon the mountains of Ararat.”
Genesis 8:5 “And the waters decreased continually until the tenth month: in the tenth month, on the first day of the month, were the tops of the mountains seen.”
There’s no contradiction here! A few years ago, the pastor of my church had told us that the bible is written in some type of order; I don’t remember the theological term or is it the literary structure used? but he said it’s written like a newspaper headline. It’s written like “Extra, extra, read all about it!” :D It gives the headline and than it expounds on it and in Gen. 8 that’s clearly how it’s written.
In verse 4 it was the 7th month when the Ark stopped on the mountain. In verse 5 it was the 10th month when Noah and the crew was FINALLY able to see the tops of the mountain. (Don’t y’all know how ships are structured? You know, the bottom of the Ark was on the mountain in the 7th month but Noah and the crew could only see water) Sheesh, you atheists like everything (from the bible i.e.) spelled out in black and white but if God had everything written down, this whole earth wouldn’t be able to contain it! :) But you know something?! That “Big Bang THEORY” is NOT “proven” but y’all still tenaciously cling to it! :)
June 30th, 2009 at 9:13 pm
Muslim Women, If you don’t practice the 5 pillars of islam, then you’re not muslim and then shouldn’t be arguing.
If you believe you are a muslim without praying, fasting, etc, then you are a hypocrite.
Case closed.
June 26th, 2009 at 1:12 pm
The real threat of the religious mindfucked assholes, is that they have access to the weapons, so they are very able to kill a lot of other mentally normal functional people just for th ehell of it, or becosue allah told them to do so in sleep.
The only solution would be to bomb all those reliogious fuckers. Why this is the only solution, is simple to answer, the reliogus fuckers are all in unconscious state of mind, so it is impossible try to reason with them.
If these reliogus assholes exists only to kill everybody born free and it is inpossible ot reaosn with them on a conscious level, there is nothing else left than defend yourself, and if by chance these assholes are all form the same geographical region, let’s not call it xenophobia, like human rights assholes do, but just sanitation of planet earth.
In case somebody doesnt still know, their symbol of a star surrounded by a moon, menas onbly one thing, like any fucking reliogion symbol, they mesmerize people from birth in order ot obey to their fucking insanity.
If these brinfucked shitface fuckers are:
1 Completely useless to the other normal conscious humans
2 Completely dangerous to other normal conscious humans
They are defined as human parasites, which means that they are not real conscious humans, they are very big microbs - parasites of human size, and they are able only to imitate humans more or less.
June 26th, 2009 at 10:44 am
No, I’m not living in Germany, rucker. I didn’t mean Germany by saying “west”. I’m living in a big city in the western coast of Turkey. And there’s a great toleration here for not going out with hijab, not fasting, not praying, not performing namaz etc. In fact no women use hijab here. So, my city is known as the “infidel X” or “non-muslim X” in Anatolia with an ironic imitation although all of us are muslims in fact of course.
Maybe I can tell about this city more later. And about muslims’s killing muslims in Iraq. But I have a strong headache now.
June 25th, 2009 at 9:23 pm
Muslim Woman - I do fear that it might be true. Xenophobia? Well, a phobia is an irrational fear. I do not think the fear of radical islam is irrational. They are a threat - a threat to you also from the way you have described yourself. They will not tolerate your going without the hijab, without praying, without fasting. The stuff I see coming out of Europe seems to indicate that most Muslims there do not intend to integrate into the cultures of the countries they have come to live in. You have said you live in the West, and I have always assumed you are in Germany. What do you see where you live, wherever that is?
This is not a good time for me to write more, but I did want to ask you one thing: What are Muslims saying about Iran right now and about the continued killing of Muslims by Muslims in Iraq. I’ve see no condemnation from either Islamic governments or Islamic NGOs. Why is that? The Muslim world goes nuts over Israel but this week alone about 200 muslims have been killed by Muslims in Iraq. Where’s the outrage? I ask not as a challenge but for information.
June 24th, 2009 at 10:47 am
Religion is population control, and is nowdays in our free society, completley subjective. Ive nothing against people that find answers in religeon but to attempt to change peoples views on it or even attempt to argue about it is a waste of time. it seems to me that religion is used as an excuse rather than a just cause.
June 24th, 2009 at 7:44 am
Can you try this link then, rucker?
http://www.metacafe.com/watch/2983375/b_t_n_d_nya_m_sl_man_olacak/
I really would like to know if you agree with the producer of the video or not. That video smells xenophobia. We moderate muslims defray the cost of the terrorists’ crimes. This is injustice.
On the other hand, I can understand that especially Sep 11 events have left a big fear behind. But I have some relatives and friends in the U.S.A. and they have American friends and neighbours there. They all look happy together in the photos. I mean, American people are not escaping from them.
June 23rd, 2009 at 11:08 pm
Muslim woman - I tried to watch but nothing played. Sorry.